Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › Renders for sequence and nested not the same
-
Renders for sequence and nested not the same
Morgan Newall replied 9 years, 9 months ago 6 Members · 27 Replies
-
Shane Ross
January 14, 2011 at 4:57 pm[Jeremy Doyle] ” But once I’m in my full timeline, I can’t easily jump back into one of my section timelines.”
Why not? It’s right there. Or do you think it is too hard to find due to the LARGE sequence you have to sort through? Use Markers to indicate the start of the sections…that’ll help.
[Jeremy Doyle] ” If I extend a section and want to copy and paste that into my full timeline I need to manually move clips down the timeline so I can paste my new section in. No auto updating.”
Try OPT-V…that will INSERT PASTE…move things down like INSERT EDITING will do. Or, use my favorite tool…TTTT (press T 4 times), and select everything downstream from where you click, then move. VERY easy. Again, my favorite tool.
Shane
GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Jeremy Doyle
January 14, 2011 at 5:04 pm[Shane Ross] “Why not? It’s right there. Or do you think it is too hard to find due to the LARGE sequence you have to sort through? Use Markers to indicate the start of the sections…that’ll help.”
Yes markers do help.
[Shane Ross] “Try OPT-V…that will INSERT PASTE…move things down like INSERT EDITING will do. Or, use my favorite tool…TTTT (press T 4 times), and select everything downstream from where you click, then move. VERY easy. Again, my favorite tool.”
Yes you are right. Very easy. Not quite as easy as not having to do anything because your timeline auto updates however.
Like I said, I have used both and will continue to use both based on the project.
-
Shane Ross
January 14, 2011 at 5:11 pm[Jeremy Doyle] “Yes you are right. Very easy. Not quite as easy as not having to do anything because your timeline auto updates however.”
Wait…how is this not AS easy? Because the timeline auto updates…from WHAT? The smaller sequence you are making changes too…and then the nest updates. OK…don’t make the change to the small sequence…make the change to the BIG one. That is what I am talking about.
When you copy and paste everything to the large sequence, you don’t go back to the smaller ones. You now work on the main sequence. All the changes are done there. You aren’t changing the smaller sequence, then copying/pasting the changes to the main sequence. JUST working in the main sequence.
Shane
GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Jeremy Doyle
January 14, 2011 at 5:41 pm[Shane Ross] “You now work on the main sequence. All the changes are done there. You aren’t changing the smaller sequence, then copying/pasting the changes to the main sequence. JUST working in the main sequence.”
The workflows are completely different.
With a nested sequence workflow you’re always working in the smaller ones.
The main sequence is purely for output.For a magazine style show with completely different segments between breaks, I find the nested sequence workflow much easier.
For a narrative style show I find working in one main sequence easier.
-
Frank Laughlin
January 14, 2011 at 5:54 pmFor those of you that edit in one big sequence, I have always gotten to a point, after what must be thousands of edis, where the system starts to slow down, throw up ever more frequent ‘preparing for display’ messages, and just doest run as well. How have you ‘one big timeliners’ avoided the system hit?
-
Shane Ross
January 14, 2011 at 5:58 pmI have 8GB of RAM. And I generally make a separate project for the main assembly. Large project sizes tend to slow things down.
Shane
GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Morgan Newall
July 24, 2016 at 3:55 pmShane, I just wanted to highlight that I, myself and I, have 32gb’s of Ram.
Yes, it is 5 years later.
Yes, I’ve had a few glasses of wine.
Best wishes,
Morgan
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up