-
Quick Real Time Demo- Updated !
-
If there’s one thing I’ve learned form this demo, it appears Charlie throws a hell of a helloween party.
-
[Jeremy Garchow] “f there’s one thing I’ve learned form this demo, it appears Charlie throws a hell of a helloween party.”
lol. I think that may be the most useful information to take away from it. It was a great party. 🙂
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~ -
[Jeremy Garchow] “If there’s one thing I’ve learned form this demo, it appears Charlie throws a hell of a helloween party.”
hahaha I was hoping I wasn’t the only person that noticed that : )
When charlie opened up that title window I was like ugghh
I have never liked the way AVID of Pr did titles. Just prefer the style of how X does it.
I’m sure others like the title tool style just fine.
I’m impressed that both programs can do all that while running. It was a nice video that Dennis put up and Charlie’s also.
-
Charlie, in PrPro you added a dust and scratches effect which I don’t recall you adding in the FCPX demo. In any case Dust and Scratches in PrPro is not a GPU accelerated effect and it’s probably the reason why the UI became unresponsive.
David
https://AllinOneFilms.com -
[David Cherniack] “Charlie, in PrPro you added a dust and scratches effect which I don’t recall you adding in the FCPX demo. In any case Dust and Scratches in PrPro is not a GPU accelerated effect and it’s probably the reason why the UI became unresponsive.”
Thanks David, Was just trying to add something similar to the “Aged Film” effect in X, which adds dust and scratches as well as grain, jitter and some other stuff. As I said though, all things considered they both performed the same-ish. Pr playback degraded but the UI remained very responsive. FCP X seemed to play back smoother, but the UI updates went to hell. Is there a better analog in Pr to that effect in FCP? I honestly don’t often use that stuff in either NLE.
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~ -
[Charlie Austin] “Is there an analog in Pr to that effect in FCP?”
No. Dust and Scratches would be the closest I guess to Aged Film. But as it’s not commonly used there’s not much incentive, I guess, for Adobe to GPU accelerate it. (Unlike with Apple and the prosumer user base of FCPX, 🙂 NOTE SMILEY!!! Please don’t loose dogs. I don’t run fast any more.
I’m surprised that PrPro played back at all with Dust and Scratches effect as it’s all done on the cpu which is already being strained mightily in your MacBook Air.
Truth be told such apples to oranges comparisons are rather meaningless…but entertaining
David
https://AllinOneFilms.com -
[David Cherniack] “Unlike with Apple and the prosumer user base of FCPX, 🙂 NOTE SMILEY!!! Please don’t loose dogs. I don’t run fast any more. “
lol Well, I guess I’m a prosumer when I cut in X, and a real pro when I cut in Pr or something else. 😉 I’ve given up loosing dogs for the most part…
[David Cherniack] “Truth be told such apples to oranges comparisons are rather meaningless…but entertaining”
Yep. 🙂 Speaking of apples to oranges, I wish Apple would post the X on Mac Pro demo I saw… playing back 16 angles of mixed 4k, full res with some RT effects while driving a 4k projector. That was pretty cool…
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~ -
[Charlie Austin] “peaking of apples to oranges, I wish Apple would post the X on Mac Pro demo I saw… playing back 16 angles of mixed 4k, full res with some RT effects while driving a 4k projector. That was pretty cool.”
Well there may be a reason why they haven’t let it loose. 🙂
BTW did they ever say if the 4K streams in that demo were ProRes?
David
https://AllinOneFilms.com -
[David Cherniack] “Well there may be a reason why they haven’t let it loose. :)”
Other than the fact that they don’t generally post demo’s I can’t think of a reason. It was quite real, I fiddled with the machine a little afterwards. In the interest of full disclosure, I can’t say for certain it was playing full res, though I’m pretty sure it was.
[David Cherniack] “BTW did they ever say if the 4K streams in that demo were ProRes?”
If I recall correctly, some were, but not all. Again, going from faulty memory here, so don’t quote me… 😉
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~ -
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up