Progressive, smooth wiggle…!

[Chris Wright]

I checked out your project…

hmmm

You can also wiggle or random seed a wiggle too which looks more hand drawn. Check out the expression forum.

https://technicolorsoftware.hostzi.com/

[John Cuevas]

Looked at your project. Think the problem(and you probably could get a better answer from the guys on the expressions forum) is that changing the frequency over one second is causing AE to calculate a new position based on the change in frequency for each frame.

So at Frame 0 the freq =4. Frame 1 = 3.57, Frame 2 = 3.35…because of that, AE has to figure out a new position based on the changing freq rate.

At this point I’m out of my depth a bit and really am going to suggest you the guys in the expressions forum might be able to better help you smooth out the transition based on what you are trying to accomplish.

Johnny Cuevas, Editor
http://www.thinkck.com

[Nico Jones]

Ah yes. That makes perfect sense. I’m out of my depth with expressions too…pickwhipping the odd parameter is about as much as I like to do! To the expressions forum I go.

Thanks John.

Nico J BB

[Chris Wright]

You’ll get much smoother results using + and * and random seeds in expressions because wiggle recalculates all new numbers.

https://technicolorsoftware.hostzi.com/

[Nico Jones]

I don’t have the first clue about using those. Guess I have some searching to do, unless anyone would be kind enough to link me to a topic or resource with details…!

Nico J BB

[Roland R. kahlenberg]

Instead of linking the slider to Frequency, try linking the slider to Amplitude instead.

HTH
Roland Kahlenberg

Sell your AEPs with broadcastGEMs’ DVD series of templates. Click here for more

[Qwe Abab]

I have the same problem