Activity › Forums › Panasonic Cameras › Panasonic Chip De-Mystified?
-
Blub06
January 12, 2006 at 4:15 pmIn the absence of F1 racing until May I guess this shoot out will have to do.
Chris
Gee guess who is going to win….
-
Blub06
January 12, 2006 at 4:21 pmOh my God did I say May? I meant the other month that begins with an M, March, as in March 12th. I am such a jerk, please forgive me.
Chris
-
John Sutherland
January 12, 2006 at 5:54 pmOff the main topic here, but always great to find another F1 fan out there. I’d sent this direct, but didn’t see an email in your profile. contact me, we should talk!
John
john@svpweb.comJohn Sutherland
MDD G4 dual 1.25
1.12 gb ram
Atto UL3D
Huge 1.2TB Dual Max
FCP 4.5
CW 4.7
OSX 10.3.6/QT 6.2.5
Radeon 9000 w/2 17″ crt monitors -
Arnie Schlissel
January 12, 2006 at 6:01 pm[George] “because it is a primary performance indicator and measure of an expensive product.”
The thing is, it’s not an expensive product, when compared to true ‘professional’ cameras. It’s modestly priced at $6k-10k. If you need the quality of 2/3″ chips with true progressive 1080 resolution, then I’m sad to tell you that you really need to spend more. Quite a lot more, really.
Arnie
https://www.arniepix.com -
Blub06
January 13, 2006 at 3:55 amI would contact you but you might be a federal Marshal, I am wanted for parole violations in three states and for questioning in some murder thing in Mexico. I didn
-
John Frey – digital west video productions
January 13, 2006 at 5:21 amAnd Nicky Hayden is the other man!
-
David Battistella
January 13, 2006 at 3:25 pmI find it odd that Panasonic has not confirmed or denied anything in this thread. Usally we hear something from them about this. There is a strange silence in this thread.
David
-
Jan Crittenden livingston
January 13, 2006 at 3:33 pmHi David,
There is nothing to deny here, there is nothing to talk about here. People want the pixel count and unfortunately I am not at liberty to discuss that. So I have discussed this in too many threads, and I am tired of discussing it, which why I have not chimed in.
Best,Jan
Jan Crittenden Livingston
Product Manager, DVCPRO, DVCPRO50, AG-DVX100
Panasonic Broadcast & TV Systems -
Gary Adcock
January 13, 2006 at 3:48 pm[Karl] “Finally the camera does shoot true progressive but since DVCPROHD codec is used to store the information, you have to store the progressive information in an interlaced stream. This is just a way to make 24p fit into the DVCPROHD codec, its not any electronic processing altering the image at all.”
that may be true in 1080 as that is the spec for the Sony developed 1080 PSF,(progressive segmented frame) — but not true of 720p which is a truly progressive capture.
Gary Adcock
Studio37
HD and Film Consultation
Chicago, IL USA
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up