Activity › Forums › DaVinci Resolve › New MacPro, iMacs
-
Ola Haldor voll
July 27, 2010 at 5:56 pmI read the 12-core top of the line base model will be $4999
-
Arthur Puig
July 27, 2010 at 6:38 pmeven Windows 7 64 on a HP workstation is not looking bad at all for Resolve
-
Gary Taylor
July 27, 2010 at 6:57 pmActually that $4,999 price is that bad considering that the price of the HP’s Z600 workstation starts at $5,699. Those hexacore chips don’t come cheap.
Gary
-
Tim Wilson
July 27, 2010 at 7:40 pmre: USB 3, it took Apple 2 years to support USB after it came out.
The first computer it appeared on was the iMac G3 in 1998, so when (if) it shows up, don’t expect it to be on a Mac Pro first…even though a pro customer can really make the best use of it!
tw
-
Jack Jones
July 27, 2010 at 8:26 pmGlad everyone else is as p***ed as me about this!
I’m actually pretty much off the idea of DaVinci based on this update. Nucuda Fuse looks the right way to go. Now if only I can convince Greg to do me a deal based on my upcoming award!
I was offered a free Scratch for 6 months, might have to take them up on that, although I find the system geared far to much towards compositing.
Grr…
Jack Jones
Freelance Colourist -
Tim Wilson
July 27, 2010 at 8:28 pmSomebody on a similar thread in the FCP forum pointed to this article about Light Peak – a connection to replace FW, USB, DisplayPort….
The article is from last year, and said that we’d see computers with Light Peak available by now, but hey, another connector is always a good thing, right? I mean, if there’s anything we need, it’s one more connector that’s incompatible with everything else.
Kidding aside, Apple may look at USB 3 as transitional enough that they can skip over it….
tw
Tim Wilson
Associate Publisher, Editor-in-Chief
Creative COW MagazineMy Blog: “Is this thing on? Oh it’s on!”
Don’t forget to rate your favorite posts!
-
Peter Berg
July 27, 2010 at 8:33 pmIf USB 3.0 will be here and gone.. what will be replacing it in the short term?
I just checked and you can buy external hard drives that have USB 3.0.. and we have heard about Blackmagic’s capturing devices for USB 3.0. Seems like USB 3.0 would be useful today. Would it cost Apple that much to put USB 3 ports instead of USB 2?
-Peter
-
Vladimir Kucherov
July 27, 2010 at 8:51 pmIf only they gave us 2-3 more PCIe slots, we’d be able to at least fit our own USB3, fibre, GPUs and whatever else comes along.
-
Arthur Puig
July 27, 2010 at 9:53 pmWhat\’s p***ng me off more about Apple is that they stopped listening to creative pros, who were always loyal to Apple, they hinted that with FCS 3 and they confirmed it now with this new MacPro, all they care now is about teenage girls tweeting about the Twilight movies.
-
Arthur Puig
July 27, 2010 at 10:06 pmThe problem with Scratch is that performance wise, compares to a DaVinci for Mac, but costs more than DaVinci for Linux, and not as good though.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up