Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Creative Community Conversations Multicam “Focus”

  • Oliver Peters

    March 11, 2015 at 8:36 pm

    [Jeremy Garchow] “I immediately get rid of the ones I don’t like, and keep the ones I do and add a marker. Since things can be named by take, you can remember what take or takes were good.”

    Sure. Of course you’d whittle them down. However in long scenes, I’ve often used a little something from every take and every angle available. I don’t necessarily know this until I start cutting the scene.

    – Oliver

    Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
    Orlando, FL
    http://www.oliverpeters.com

  • Oliver Peters

    March 11, 2015 at 8:38 pm

    [James Ewart] “o you put thirty different takes in one string out?
    I think we can make some decisions from logging no?”

    In their example, yes, in the first pass. Note that Baxter mentions reviewing this and then pulling the possibles he likes as the next pass.

    As far as logging, yes, that would be done in conjunction.

    – Oliver

    Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
    Orlando, FL
    http://www.oliverpeters.com

  • Jeremy Garchow

    March 11, 2015 at 8:41 pm

    [Oliver Peters] “Sure. Of course you’d whittle them down. However in long scenes, I’ve often used a little something from every take and every angle available. I don’t necessarily know this until I start cutting the scene.

    But of course. That’s where Auditions shine is when you actually start cutting the scene. And they can be finalized! 🙂

  • James Ewart

    March 11, 2015 at 9:38 pm

    yeah because previous workflows were based upon previous software solutions.

  • Oliver Peters

    March 11, 2015 at 10:36 pm

    [Jeremy Garchow] “That’s where Auditions shine is when you actually start cutting the scene”

    Again – entirely personal preference. For me, I tried it and it was largely useless.

    – Oliver

    Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
    Orlando, FL
    http://www.oliverpeters.com

  • Charlie Austin

    March 11, 2015 at 10:39 pm

    [Oliver Peters] “entirely personal preference”

    So… we seem to have established that individual editors work in different ways. Weird. 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Oliver Peters

    March 11, 2015 at 10:40 pm

    [James Ewart] “yeah because previous workflows were based upon previous software solutions.”

    No. Previous workflows were based on what editors felt was best for their operating style. Sometimes in spite of the software. For example, Avid offers Script Based Editing, commonly referred to as ScriptSync (the automatic portion of it). Many Avid editors would consider this to be a vast improvement because of the software solution it offers. Yet, many other Avid editors never use it, even when it’s available to them and often even after they’ve had their assistants set up the bins for it.

    – Oliver

    Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
    Orlando, FL
    http://www.oliverpeters.com

  • Charlie Austin

    March 11, 2015 at 11:48 pm

    [Oliver Peters] “Yet, many other Avid editors never use it, even when it’s available to them and often even after they’ve had their assistants set up the bins for it.”

    That’s how I feel about Mixers in NLE’s. 😉

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • James Ewart

    March 12, 2015 at 7:29 am

    [Oliver Peters] “No. Previous workflows were based on what editors felt was best for their operating style.”

    I cannot entirely agree with but understand the point you are making. If the option is not there you cannot make the choice whether to use it or not or whether it will come part of your operating style.

    And part of the problem with shifting to X from any of the other NLE (only my personal opinion of course) is you have to make some changes to the way you work if you are going to reap the benefits. I didn’t use Auditions but decided to make myself do so and now they have become something I use all the time (albeit for best takes).

    I don’t think I am alone in having an inclination to become set in my ways and Apple gave me a good old kick in the arse. If they had continued with FCP7 in parallel I never in a million years would have made the move to X if I am honest. At the time is was a little painful but it did me the world of good.

  • Jeremy Garchow

    March 12, 2015 at 3:49 pm

    [Oliver Peters] “Again – entirely personal preference. For me, I tried it and it was largely useless.

    That’s cool. I find them to be very useful. I can store more decisions with easier access in one single timeline than I ever could in any other NLE.

Page 3 of 4

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy