Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Keep the camera originals or not – what say you?

  • Craig Seeman

    March 9, 2019 at 3:34 am

    [Tangier Clarke] “It’d simply be in mov form and not camera card original form.”

    But another NLE may not like the camera codec in a mov container. It’s too hard to predict where the industry will years forward from now.

  • Bret Williams

    March 9, 2019 at 3:34 am

    Just drag the folder directly to the event. I open the import window like once a year. If you have spanned clips they will come in separately, but that’s not such a big deal.

    _______________________________________________________________________
    https://BretFX.com FCPX Plugins & Templates for Editors & Motion Graphics Artists
    Hang Tag https://bretfx.com/product/hang-tag
    Overshoot Text https://bretfx.com/product/overshoot-text/
    Outliner https://bretfx.com/product/outliner/
    Clock Maker https://bretfx.com/product/bretfx-clock-maker/

  • Tangier Clarke

    March 9, 2019 at 4:09 am

    Will give it a shot. Though doing some reading and depending on usage of effects, color, just simple edits etc. my understanding is that although FCP X plays the MXF files just fine, that there are circumstances when not to use the raw mxf files. I seldom used the import window either. I always just drag to the event. I need to double check that FCP X behaves differently when using either method in terms of copying or leaving in place. I think it does though.

  • Bret Williams

    March 9, 2019 at 4:14 am

    It completely does. It’s even in the manual. Some formats really suck when not rewrapped. some Sony AVCHD I think. But if you ever have performance issues you just hit the transcode button and it’s then working off ProRes.

    As long as you’re not working off Xeon, all these h264 formats are handled great by a MacBook or iMac natively. I do lots of layers and effects, plugins, compounds inside compounds inside compounds. All good. when you drag in, your import settings are what’s in the import settings in FCPX prefs.

    _______________________________________________________________________
    https://BretFX.com FCPX Plugins & Templates for Editors & Motion Graphics Artists
    Hang Tag https://bretfx.com/product/hang-tag
    Overshoot Text https://bretfx.com/product/overshoot-text/
    Outliner https://bretfx.com/product/outliner/
    Clock Maker https://bretfx.com/product/bretfx-clock-maker/

  • Tangier Clarke

    March 9, 2019 at 5:31 am

    I am on a Mac Pro (2013-Black trashcan with Xeon processors) and a 2016 MacBook Pro. The MP handles all my footage just fine. It’s just horrible when it comes to compressing or transcoding H.264. That’s where my MBP shines and even my old 2012 MBP would run circles around my MP due to Intel QuickSync. The FS7 MXF files at 4K on a 4TB LaCie mobile rugged RAID play incredibly fluidly over 1080p HD from a C100. I can scrub though these MXF files (rewrapped or not) with no lag. Multicam is pretty decent too with two FS7 cams and no proxies yet. I count this to the XAVC-I intraframe codec rather than interframe.

  • Joe Marler

    March 9, 2019 at 1:21 pm

    [Craig Seeman] “…wanted shots that may not have been used in the original. Sometimes they’re looking for things left “on the cutting room floor” as it were. It only happens occasionally but it was far easier for me to import from the camera masters into FCPX than to try to resurrect and FCP legacy project. “

    In my case it’s not the legacy project but the legacy library that’s important. The last doc I worked on had 125 multi-cam interviews, 151 camera hours of material, 62 hrs external multi-channel audio, 3,133 clips totaling about 10 terabytes. Weeks of effort by multiple assistants went into rating and keywording the material. This enables later rapid retrieval during post — and afterward.

    After delivery, if a subsequent request comes in to find a certain camera angle from a certain interview or to find additional b-roll to cover dialog, for me it’s usually easier to leverage the library which is already highly organized. This is especially for cases where sync’d multicams or sync’d external foreign language audio is required — that’s already done inside the library. If I kept only the camera files I couldn’t relink to those so the massive investment in the library would be lost.

    In Tangier’s case, another complication is he probably cannot import the MXF with “leave files in place”. That can be a major issue if dealing with lots of material. It makes the library huge, which makes file-level library backups difficult. You can alter library properties to store that externally but that media will be in the reorganized FCPX folder structure and bear little resemblance to the original.

    I like doing most of the data organizing inside FCPX, but I do a small amount outside before import — rename files, use a basic folder structure based on shooting day, operator+camera type, etc. Tree-oriented camera media is a dilemma. If you try to rename those in Finder, it may run afoul of embedded metadata storing the original filename. Some manufacturers have proprietary ingest tools to handle this. Or if you copy the bare video files out of the tree to obtain “leave files in place”, it might cause other problems.

    Whether the files are re-wrapped by FCPX during import or by EditReady before import, if those are not saved you cannot later relink, thus you can never reload the project OR library. This creates the “double save” dilemma Tangier is trying to avoid. You either trust the rewrapped files and write off the camera files or buy more disk drives or LTO tape and save two copies of camera media *and* two copies of the rewrapped media.

  • Bret Williams

    March 13, 2019 at 5:12 pm

    Ah but you can leave MXF in place. Just drag them directly from the finder to the event window. MXF is even supported by quick look these days.

    _______________________________________________________________________
    https://BretFX.com FCPX Plugins & Templates for Editors & Motion Graphics Artists
    Hang Tag https://bretfx.com/product/hang-tag
    Overshoot Text https://bretfx.com/product/overshoot-text/
    Outliner https://bretfx.com/product/outliner/
    Clock Maker https://bretfx.com/product/bretfx-clock-maker/

  • Tangier Clarke

    March 13, 2019 at 6:02 pm

    Ok, folks I’ve been doing some testing, examining, playing around with these MXF files from the Sony FS7 and looking into the XML files in the card structure. Though DaVinci Resolve is not pertinent for what I am trying to find out, it helped to have another NLE to see how two different systems handled the same content, which in turn helped me verify (or not) certain things about the MXF and MOV files. Here’s what I discovered:

    Tools: FCP X 10.4.5 and DaVinci Resolve 15, MediaInfo app
    Hardware: 2013 Mac Pro 3.5 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon E5/ 64 GB RAM /Two AMD FirePro D500/ Thunderbolt 2 connected drives.
    OS: mac OS Mojave: 10.14.3

    Using FCP X import window rewraps MXF files to .mov with no option (even from hard) drive to “leave in place”. Dragging in MXF files to FCP X event keeps MXF files as MXF and MXF files are allowed to stay in place inside their card structure on the hard drive.

    Playback of MXF files in DaVinci Resolve 15 is much choppier than FCP X. Lots of green scrubbing frames as well in DaVinci Resolve. The rewrapped version of these files played back much smoother than their originals.

    Using MediaInfo I noticed that the .mov FCP X created (due to using the import window) which was a rewrap it seems and not a transcode of the MXF retained all of the pertinent information and metadata that the MXF had and needed for playback and identifying the camera LUT used; in this case – Sony S-Log3/S-Gamut3.Cine.

    I created a new library in FCP X and brought the .mov file in to see if FCP X had and/or would identify the LUT (meaning that it’s truly with the file) and it applied the LUT right away. The LUT info was presented in the inspector in the Camera LUT fields and Color Profile. I didn’t want to give FCP X a chance to use any potential previous database info on how to handle the file. To further confirm the LUT info was there I used DaVinci Resolve 15 and brought the same clip in. It showed flat. I had to apply the LUT manually. Behaviors between the two apps are different, but it seems nothing so far is lost.

    The rewrapped MXF to .mov is an mp4 Quicktime inside a .mov. I am thinking that it has to be this way because because perhaps mp4 don’t support PCM audio, but .mov files do. (I could be wrong on this).

    The rewrapped .mov from the MXF seems to have all of the pertinent information needed to keep these files instead of the MXF files. I compared information using MediaInfo going line by line to review all of the file structure, metadata, and header information. I recognize this is not scientific.

    If money were no object it wouldn’t matter. We’d keep everything. As it stands that’s likely what we’ll do anyway for now, but in the end everything will be edited, archived, referenced, searched, and potentially one day unarchived using the .mov files. So I am keeping these findings in consideration in the case I do have to (dare I say it) ditch the Sony card structure originals.

    I know there is no one size fits all solution.

  • Joby Anthony jr

    April 8, 2019 at 5:41 pm

    Tangier, I know this is a few weeks down the road from your initial question, but you described the same dilemma we’ve wrestled with. It resonated.

    For what it’s worth, what I’ve ended up doing is saving the card originals on a couple of harddrives for a period of time. As the drives fill up, basically rolling off old cards as newer ones come in. That way I can always go back to a card original if I need to for any reason (e.g., are we missing a clip from the card, corruption somewhere in the handoff, rewrap, rename, moving, etc. process, and so on). I’ve probably got a year and a half worth of cards I can go back to. Comes in handy from time-to-time, especially as a double-check. But ultimately relying on the re-wrap re-names as the master files down-the-line, for many of the reasons mentioned by others.

    I also appreciated your testing and reporting on re-wrap/don’t re-wrap. Bret’s info about treating mxf files was news to me. But glad to know that at least your experience seemed to reveal no harm either way. Might help me re-think some of our workflow.

    And to Joe’s point about future-proofing the library as maybe just as or more important. Yes!! I discovered much later than I should have that little tidbit coming off 10.0 several years ago. Once discovered, did a 30-day panic to convert everything. I pay closer to attention to these things now!

    Joby.

  • Tangier Clarke

    April 8, 2019 at 10:26 pm

    Joby, I am glad to hear it had some value. I am backing up all the cards to a RAID we have at the office, but I’ve rewrapped and restriped the Tentacle and/or Ambient box timecode (using LTC convert) of those clips, organized them and synced them (using Sync N Link X and FCP X audio syncing) onto another drive; that being a 10 TB Western digital. We have a clone of that drive. From there I offload episodic events to LaCie rugged thunderbolt drives for myself and another editor and we do our work from there. We then go back to the WD drive just to get a new episode and update the events. Seems to work so far. I am saving many XMLs throughout these stages to insure I have those backups. In the end we’ll likely delete the card originals when the series is done.

Page 2 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy