Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DaVinci Resolve HD to SD conversion “flicker free” with DaVinci?

  • Blase Theodore

    January 8, 2011 at 5:45 pm

    [Ola Haldor Voll] “I know for a fact that Compressor doesn’t do a good job. Thin lines and fine details will flicker, and it will be kind of jumpy in “crash pans” or fast motions.”

    Ola, when you used Compressor, were you turning on Frame Controls and setting scaling to “best”? It defaults to “fastest” if you don’t change it, which means Compressor sucks if you don’t tweak it.

    Figured I’d at least mention it, in case you weren’t already doing that.

    Also, make sure you’ve set resolve to “smoother filter” instead of “sharper filter” in the resize setting.

  • Ola Haldor voll

    January 8, 2011 at 6:22 pm

    Thanks for the heads up. Will test tomorrow.

  • Margus Voll

    January 8, 2011 at 9:33 pm

    sounds like “smoother filter” will do the trick with those insanely flickering lines in sd on crt.

    Margus

    https://iconstudios.eu

  • Nate Weaver

    January 9, 2011 at 1:44 am

    Or going from 50 to 51 on the blur knob

    Nate Weaver
    Director/D.P., Los Angeles
    https://www.nateweaver.net

  • Ola Haldor voll

    January 9, 2011 at 11:18 am

    They’re shot on 5D MK II and a EX3. All in 25p.

  • Uli Plank

    January 9, 2011 at 3:40 pm

    Then make sure that they are not treated as interlaced – that might introduce ugly artifacts.

    Director of the Institute of Media Research (IMF) at Braunschweig University of Arts

  • Helge Løken

    January 9, 2011 at 3:40 pm

    I’ve done a fairly comprehensive test of conversion in DaVinci Resolve and the downconversion is amazing. A lot better then anything you can do with Final Cut Studio (including Compressor set to Best, which is really slow and not that great). Use smoother filter. Quality is good provided you go from Progressive, Interlaced scaling is not nearly as good.

  • Gabriele Turchi

    January 9, 2011 at 3:44 pm

    good info heige!

    are you referring to rendering out and not realtime downconversion right?

    thanks

    g

  • Helge Løken

    January 9, 2011 at 3:48 pm

    Indeed when you render it out. It’s always the highest quality no matter how you’ve set up your system.

    When you downconvert interlaced material you have to use the “field rendering” option in order for the motion to look correct. However, results are not nearly as great. Quite a bit of aliasing.

  • Gabriele Turchi

    January 9, 2011 at 3:51 pm

    did you ever compared the results out of resolve to a deck (like SR or D5) downcoversion ?

    in the past i compared D5 , compressor, and SCRATCH ,

    D5 won but Scratch results was pretty close using the lanzcos filter (compressor with frame control on was worse …)

    g

Page 2 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy