-
fwiw
-
[Jeremy Garchow] “Hi, Dave.
Yes. FCPXML as the xmls from FCPX are known (the resulting files have a .fcpxml extension)
As opposed to the .XML files that FCP7 (et al) creates. (XMEML)
Jeremy
“Thanks for clarifying
Cheers
Dave
———————————————————————————————————
David McGavran, Adobe Systems Incorporated
Senior Engineering Manager Adobe Premiere Pro
——————————————————————————————————— -
[Steve Connor] “Have you had a chance to play with CC yet?”
I’m using CC on a large, flashy Sizzle right now, and loving it. I’m still discovering lots of things new to me and am at gee-whiz phase. I’ve gotten to really like the window docking and tabbing, especially on multiple monitors. I love having separate mixers for clips and tracks. I still feel Avid is a slightly better cutter, but part of that might be me blundering in to CC and not approaching it in a more organized fashion. Avid also feels snappier in terms of playback control, but again, that might be an adjustment that I need to make somewhere, but haven’t yet. Overall, its quite good.
-
nothing like working friday evening – yep. I like it a lot. I’ve had plays in the CC version. it feels extremely nice. the cc timeline feels lovely. That’s the timeline I’d want to edit in really.
also – for anyone at all mograph shortform combo inclined coming from legend – its hard now to see any other edit system realistically.
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
[Aindreas Gallagher] “also – for anyone at all mograph shortform combo inclined coming from legend – its hard now to see any other edit system realistically.”
Yah. It’s pretty neat.
-
[Chris Harlan] “Yah. It’s pretty neat.”
and the source code will probably soon be open source 🙂
Steve Connor
There’s nothing we can’t argue about on the FCPX COW Forum
-
[Steve Connor] “and the source code will probably soon be open source 🙂
“LOL. Yeah, I got the notice last night along with everybody else.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up