Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › Final Cut X vs Strawman
-
Lance Bachelder
February 7, 2012 at 8:43 amCash is cool 🙂
Lance Bachelder
Writer, Editor, Director
Irvine, California -
Steve Connor
February 7, 2012 at 9:29 am[Lance Bachelder] “I wish you had been there when I was a beta tester, it was a terrible experience – I mean so bad that it would take therapy to erase how bad it was and how full of bugs the program was.
“Interesting to get a view on how PPro was in it’s early days, I know it’s very good now, but it’s had the time to mature.
Steve Connor
“FCPX Agitator”
Adrenalin Television -
Lance Bachelder
February 7, 2012 at 9:37 pmIt was bad to the tune of thousands of dollars and lawyers getting involved to settle all the extra costs incurred by attempting to use the software on a feature and then getting abandoned by Adobe as the entire team that launched PPro left the company.
I know it’s not as bad as it was in the early days but we still found it unusable up to version 5 for feature film editing. This was strictly a bug and crash issue, not a lack of features. I’m hearing that 5.5 is great but for me I’ll stick with FCPX for now…
Lance Bachelder
Writer, Editor, Director
Irvine, California
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up