Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › FCPX proving to be very fast
-
Tony West
January 14, 2013 at 2:23 am[Aindreas Gallagher] “They need to persuade broad groups that it is viable and advantageous.”
Agreed.
I had a couple of documentary directors over the other day to lay down some VO
I’m showed them some things on X before we got started.
One said to me “I’ve heard nothing but bad things about it but I’ve never laid eyes on it until now”
They both were pretty impressed with the tagging and what not. They both can cut a little but not like you.
I could see them starting a doc in X and then trying to take it to somebody like you are some of these other talented folks on here.
-
Aindreas Gallagher
January 14, 2013 at 2:32 amno no mate 🙂 I’m literally just argumentative – don’t extrapolate.
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
Steve Connor
January 14, 2013 at 2:37 amI think we should start a pool on the exact date Aindreas does his first paid FCPX Job.
BTW is it snowing in London yet?
Steve Connor
‘It’s just my opinion, with an occasional fact thrown in for good measure” -
Charlie Austin
January 14, 2013 at 3:05 amHere’s a culture show for ya.:-) Many millions saw this. Possibly billions! LOL
Cut on FCPX, onlined on an Avid of some flavor. Honestly, other than the nice clean picture, the effects in the offline looked better…There are some great plugins for X… Groundbreaking? Nope. Not gonna win a key art for this. 😉 But it was all over TV and the intertubes, and it was cut on X. Fast. 😉
————————————————————-
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
-
Brooks Tomlinson
January 14, 2013 at 8:07 pmFor organizing the media and getting the first cut done, there is nothing faster than FCPX, and I have used them all. Where I find it falls down is in the end part, tweaking, revisions, and project duplications , then finally archiving.
For me, it was like you lost all that speed you had at the start, and actually starts to take longer.
I will be interested to see how the blog about the whole process goes.
Brooks Tomlinson
“I dream in 32bit float” -
John Davidson
January 14, 2013 at 8:08 pmThanks – I think you’ll like our versions solution.
John Davidson | President / Creative Director | Magic Feather Inc.
-
James Ewart
February 25, 2013 at 11:48 amThis is all so dull. Go back to FCP 1 thru 5. Everyone was saying the same thing. Anyone who used it was unprofessional. And then Mr Murch used it on Cold Mountain and suddenly all these Avid editors were also FCP editors too.
Anyone wo takes so much time to discredit software like FCP X looks like they are scared of change to me.
Also might there be a hidden agenda. Soho has a lot of money tied up in Avid software and hardware but look at the hardware these facilities are running?Quite old kit innit?
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up