-
Dear FCPX team,
-
No, it’s not a bad idea at all. But right now what I need is not there to purchase from third parties. I think the big question is how long people are willing to wait.
And I’d buy you dinner too. Whether you get it or not.
bigpine
-
Just terrific!
-
[Bill Davis] “Jeremy,
If you’re ever out here in Scottsdale, I’m buying dinner.
You get it.
Peace.”
Ha! I wouldn’t go so far as to say “I get it”, but I thank you none the less!
Jeremy
-
[TImothy Auld] “No, it’s not a bad idea at all. But right now what I need is not there to purchase from third parties. I think the big question is how long people are willing to wait.”
Yeah, it’s a big question. As a matter of fact, I think Intelligent Assistant is launching Xto7 today which will allow sending a sequence from X to FCP7 and all that goes along with that (OMF, XML, EDL, Color, etc and so forth). I also heard it’s $49.95. I’m sure we will know more later today.
Jeremy
-
Parts of the magnetic timeline are very clunky and trying to bypass it with the positioner tool is a joke, it inserts slugs instead of leaving blank space. But I do love the fact that when I make a change I don’t have to change things downstream. I think Avid and Adobe will take the best parts of it and use it.
Luke Hale
Producer/Editor BYU-I and Department of Energy
opticalsmarts.com (Just for fun) -
[Luke Hale] “it inserts slugs instead of leaving blank space.”
And how do you see this as being any different? The gaps left in FCPX are more powerful and controlling than the “blank space” of FCP7. Also, Avid also has the idea of gaps. They are trimmable, effectable and generally more powerful than what FCP7 offers, and closer to what FCPX offers, but even better.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up