Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro Cuda rendering in Vegas 12 Build 770

  • Graham Bernard

    February 3, 2014 at 4:11 pm

    [John Rofrano] “This is why I’m starting to believe that Vegas Pro editors would be better off buying newer AMD Radeon cards rather than newer NVIDIA cards until Sony address this.”

    Any time soon, on the SONY address thing? – Don’t answer…

    I held out 2 years back to get the box I have now. I’m not going to get burned on doing the experimentation for somebody else’s benefit, on my dime too. But we have been here before . . and . . .

    I was considering the nVid GTX Titan, but not now.

    Grazie

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • Stephen Crye

    February 4, 2014 at 5:49 am

    Zach, have a look at this thread, discusses the problem in detail.

    https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/24/973767#973907

    Steve

    Win7 Pro X64 on Dell T7500, MultiTB SATA, 12GB RAM, nVidia Quadro 2000, Vegas 12, 11, 10, 9 DVDA 6.0 & 5.2(build 135) Sony HDR-CX550V, Panasonic GH3 with LUMIX G X VARIO 12-35mm / F2.8 ASPH, LUMIX G X VARIO 35-100mm / F2.8

  • Stephen Crye

    February 5, 2014 at 4:21 am

    Hi All;

    As I continue to struggle with optimizing my system, I am realizing that chasing GPU-assist might not be really worth all the headaches.

    For example, “Upload to Youtube” does not use my GPU at all. But, I get 3x faster render on the same project using CUDA (I have a Quadro 2000 and an Xeon 5606).

    I often render projects that are a mix of Sony mt2s, Panny 50 h.264 .mov and .avi produced with HuffYUV and veeDub64. Depending on the source file, I might see GPU at 80% or close to zero.

    I’m starting to shop around for a new mombo. This time I am going to be picky and get it right.

    Steve

    Win7 Pro X64 on Dell T7500, MultiTB SATA, 12GB RAM, nVidia Quadro 2000, Vegas 12, 11, 10, 9 DVDA 6.0 & 5.2(build 135) Sony HDR-CX550V, Panasonic GH3 with LUMIX G X VARIO 12-35mm / F2.8 ASPH, LUMIX G X VARIO 35-100mm / F2.8

  • Steve Rhoden

    February 5, 2014 at 8:12 am

    I am realizing that chasing GPU-assist might not be really worth all the headaches.
    Correct, its not worth it at all!

    Steve Rhoden
    (Cow Leader)
    Film Editor & Compositor.
    Filmex Creative Media.
    https://www.facebook.com/FilmexCreativeMedia
    1-876-461-9019

  • Graham Bernard

    February 5, 2014 at 8:16 am

    Steve, what GPU do you use?

    G

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • Steve Rhoden

    February 5, 2014 at 2:00 pm

    I dont purchase/use any kind of GPU card or any specialized built
    system Graham. I dont bother with those stress anymore, i simply
    purchase the average Joe’s powerful laptops, disable most of the
    softwares GPU needs and have no issues whatsoever, no matter
    how complex a Vegas, After Effects or 3D Project i throw at it
    with any source video format.
    You see, whats causing so much crashes and frustration for most
    users, are the specialized hardware/cards and the softwares
    integration with them, And its marketed as if you need to
    have these cards if you want to stay at the cutting edge of fast
    editing technology etc, NO YOU DONT.
    I just hit render, move to my next system to do some more
    editing and patiently wait until my renders are completed.

    Steve Rhoden
    (Cow Leader)
    Film Editor & Compositor.
    Filmex Creative Media.
    https://www.facebook.com/FilmexCreativeMedia
    1-876-461-9019

  • Graham Bernard

    February 5, 2014 at 4:08 pm

    Thank you for that Steve.

    G

    Video Content Creator and Potter
    PC 7 64-bit 16gb * Intel® Core™i7-2600k Quad Core 3.40GHz * 2GB NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 Ti
    Cameras: Canon XF300 + PowerShot SX50HS Bridge

  • Stephen Crye

    February 9, 2014 at 6:20 am

    I’m tending to agree with Steve R. regarding render & patiently waiting. But one thing I do need and want is fast real-time preview at reasonably good resolution. Wondering … can I get that with fast CPU?

    Steve

    Win7 Pro X64 on Dell T7500, MultiTB SATA, 12GB RAM, nVidia Quadro 2000, Vegas 12, 11, 10, 9 DVDA 6.0 & 5.2(build 135) Sony HDR-CX550V, Panasonic GH3 with LUMIX G X VARIO 12-35mm / F2.8 ASPH, LUMIX G X VARIO 35-100mm / F2.8

  • Steve Rhoden

    February 9, 2014 at 11:24 am

    Fast real-time preview at reasonably good resolution could
    depend on Memory Cache (along that line).
    They could take the Dynamic Ram feature to a higher level, to
    do some kind of background pre-rendering etc.

    Steve Rhoden
    (Cow Leader)
    Film Editor & Compositor.
    Filmex Creative Media.
    https://www.facebook.com/FilmexCreativeMedia
    1-876-461-9019

  • John Rofrano

    February 9, 2014 at 3:32 pm

    [Steve Rhoden] “They could take the Dynamic Ram feature to a higher level, to do some kind of background pre-rendering etc.”

    Most other NLE’s already do this. Vegas Pro makes it a manual step and then does a horrible job of keeping track of what was pre-rendered. I agree Sony needs to step up in this area and at least catch up with other NLE’s.

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

Page 2 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy