Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro Converting .m2ts for YouTube viewing?

  • John Lee

    October 18, 2014 at 1:15 pm

    Thanks for the reply.

    1. No, I did not change those preferences (and I actually don’t even see an “Internal” tab in Preferences.

    2. I’m frustrated because these are the settings I’ve always used. It produces a beautiful video to watch on my PC, but the uploaded version on YT is somewhat pixelated and definitely not smooth.

    Here is an example of what is happening to me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw49k8kcbSg

    3. I see your settings, but the menu is different than mine (I used Sony AVC/MVC 1920×1080-60i. I have always used a modified version with a bitrate of 18MM, but the example below is an unmodified one where the bitrate is 16MM.

    What “family” is your settings from? Does it produce an .m2ts file?

    Thanks. I am really frustrated.

  • Francis S. dobos

    October 18, 2014 at 2:12 pm

    Hello John!
    1. The Internal tab in the Preferences is hidden, because changing it means risk. Don’t worry about it.
    2.The video example (test avchd 1920×1080 60i) is perfect! I don’t see any quality problem. It is smooth, nothing pixelating.
    3. I am in Europe, we use the PAL system templates (1920×1080 50i). You have to use the NTSC system. It is OK. But rendering for the YT with 18 Mbps bitrate is unnecessary. YT decreases the bitrate significantly. I suggest using the original template. My camcorder (HDR CX700VE) records m2ts files (1920×1080 50i), I edit them with Vegas 13.

    I don’t know why you see quality problems viewing the uploaded file. It is perfect.

    Francis S. Dobos

  • John Lee

    October 18, 2014 at 2:58 pm

    First, thank you for your replies. I realized that you were in Europe and your settings could be slightly different, but it sounds like we are talking the same lanauge.

    Really? I tried viewing the video from a different computer and I still see the same problem – it is not smooth and it’s maybe not pixelated, but it’s a little blocky. There is a tremendous difference between the original version viewed on my PC, and the one on YT.

    Yes, I know YT degrades the quality of the original as it is processed, but it is nothing like I’ve ever seen before.

    Let’s try this. This first link is a video I uploaded a few weeks ago, and it still looks great.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ak3px53cnbk

    This 2nd link is the same video (a little longer, but the same video files merged together), but uploaded recently and it looks appreciably worse. Do you see a difference between the two?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04i8GCryFhs

  • John Lee

    October 18, 2014 at 3:45 pm

    Nigel,

    It may not be an SV issue. First of all, did you see an issue with the two videos I posted? The first should look great, the second should show the issues I’m talking about.

    I just did a test using SV and then Sony Playmemories. Both videos are below (the Playmemories is the 2nd one). Both look the same – slightly blocky and definitely not smooth.

    The only thing I can think of is that I’ve been trying to get a virus off my PC, and maybe I played around with msconfig a bit to stop certain programs from loading up. I went back and have allowed everything to pop up, but I am stumped why my videos look great on the PC, but not uploaded to YT.

    Using SV: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Utfl3GFp570

    Using Sony Playmemories: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dTldTLalfM

  • Francis S. dobos

    October 18, 2014 at 4:09 pm

    I downloaded both clips directly from Youtube. In Windows Media Player both are perfect. Nothing quality problem. According to Mediainfo the two clips are nearly the same. Here are the results:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/fkcmd0n8alymfhi/firstclipsets.jpg?dl=0
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/fw476c5syn38fmv/secondclipsets.jpg?dl=0

    The only difference is the frame rate mode: the first clip has constant, the second one has variable frame rate.

    I don’t know why you see degraded quality in the second case. But it is sure, editing, rendering and uploading was OK.

    Francis S. Dobos

  • John Lee

    October 18, 2014 at 6:04 pm

    Thank you for replying. How did the 2 videos look on YouTube? On my PC, the two videos looked identical and great, but the 2nd video looked terrible on YT. How did it look for you?

  • Francis S. dobos

    October 19, 2014 at 6:24 am

    I have watched again the second video on Youtube (I made there a remark also). The playing quality was 720p, but not on full screen. I did not see any problem considering the quality. It is perfect.

    Francis S. Dobos

  • John Lee

    October 19, 2014 at 1:48 pm

    I’m really stumped. I know the quality on YT is always not as good as the original file, but it simply looks like there is a flicker.

    Did you see the same problem with the first video as well?

  • Francis S. dobos

    October 19, 2014 at 2:30 pm

    I don’t see problems with the videos. I watched them directly on the Youtube (movie mode, 720p resolution), the quality was perfect. There is no difference between playing the downloaded versions on the PC (with Windows Media Player ) and viewing them on the Youtube. Both of them have good quality. Ask a friend in the US to control the YT quality. Here in Europe everything is all right.

    Francis S. Dobos

  • Quincy Berry

    October 20, 2014 at 1:49 am

    I would just like to add my 2 cents. Videos I uploaded starting 2 weeks ago are very pixelated when being played on youtube. 720p full screen looks very pixelated. I don’t know if I changed a setting. I will do a test re render it at 1080p but I have a few 720p videos and they didn’t look as bad as the recent uploads. I was wondering the same thing, if Youtube is cheaping out and compressing it even more, it looks bad. Something is different.

Page 2 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy