Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › Connecting old broadcast monitor to Fcp in new thunderbolt Imac????
-
Connecting old broadcast monitor to Fcp in new thunderbolt Imac????
John Aiken replied 13 years, 11 months ago 7 Members · 36 Replies
-
Shane Ross
February 27, 2012 at 1:46 am1080p60 playback doesn’t exist with any IO device. Because that isn’t a standard format. 1080 only plays back at 30fps. On TV, BluRay and web. The only 60fps format that is standard is 720p. 1080p60 exists I guess to make smooth slo motion conversion.
Shane
Little Frog Post
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Adam Acres
February 27, 2012 at 10:25 amI seem to disagree…why does intensity shuttle thunderbolt from blackmagic design list as 1080p60 HD playback support then?
https://www.blackmagic-design.com/uk/products/intensity/techspecs/
Maybe we are both confused here?
I think I have overstayed my welcome for now. So thank you all sincerely for all of your help!
Adam
-
Bret Williams
February 27, 2012 at 1:21 pmI guess I don’t understand. The intensity extreme and matrox mxo2 mini both have 3 types of analog input and output. I use both connected to an iMac via tmunderbolt. I connect both to a pvm20 via component analog and to an HS LCD via HDMI. The matrox USA more powerful for conversions up/down or cross. It can also output multiple streams- for example it can cross convert 720p to 1080i on output while simeultaneously outputting a hardware converted 486i SD singal either center cut or letterboxed. That little mini can do nearly as much as a full blown AJA except tape deck control- but a cheap USB serial port adapter and rs422 cable does that. The downside of the mini and extreme are the connections. No SDI or XLR or BNC. They’re also limited to 2channel analog input.
-
Jerry Hofmann
February 27, 2012 at 1:45 pmWell… that’s not quite right, when the conversions are going on, the Decklink and Matrox products are using the computer’s CPU for the heavy lifting (taxing your system for other purposes like RT playback) where the AJA products do the job internally. Plus the Io XT has the only T-Bolt connections that loops through, so in every other case you can’t use a second computer display with your system (they have to be at the end of the TB chain).
If it were me, I’d buy the Io from AJA for this reason alone. Costs more, does more.
Hoewever in the OP’s case, he’s also going to need an Analog to SDI converter to capture the old VHS, Hi 8 etc. Plus he gets desk control with the Io XT.
I could never give up a second computer display for my main editing system..
Jerry
Apple Certified Trainer, Producer, Writer, Director Editor, Gun for Hire and other things. I ski. My Blog: https://blogs.creativecow.net/Jerry-Hofmann
Current DVD:
https://store.creativecow.net/p/81/jerry_hofmanns_final_cut_system_setup8-Core 3.0 Intel Mac Pro, Dual 2 gig G5, AJA Kona SD, AJA Kona 2, Huge Systems Array UL3D, AJA Io HD, 17″ MBP, Matrox MXO2 with MAX – Cinema Displays I have a 22″ that I paid 4k for still working. G4 with Kona SD card, and SCSI card.
-
Shane Ross
February 27, 2012 at 3:19 pmSO it does! Still doesn’t change the fact that 1080p60 doesn’t exist as a distribution medium. No BluRay, no tape, no web…computer playback will struggle.
Shane
Little Frog Post
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Bret Williams
February 27, 2012 at 5:52 pmThe matrox mini is absolutely doing everything in hardware. Can you point to any documentation that shows any different? If it its, it doesn’t matter. The matrox mxo2 mini upscales and downscales beautifully and adds pulldown, etc. It does not tax the system any different. It plays out SD and HD at all times. I’ve never had a hit on my RT by doing a center cut SD output to my PVM while simultaneously uprezzing 720p to 1080i on my HDMI connected HD monitor. And I use the matrox with a 2006 MacPro, AND use it on the top of the line 27″ iMac with Thunderbolt adapter. The matrox abilities are exactly the same. I also have a intensity I’ve been putting through the tests. It specifies on it’s website which downscales to SD are software.
Why would you need some sort of SDI convertor for digitizing old analog stuff? They’re component or composite. There’s no SDI on a MXO2 mini or a extreme. They’re solely analog or HDMI. I load in VHS stuff for friends all the time. I digitize betacam via component to ProRes. Use an adapter I’ve had since version 1.2 of Final Cut Pro when I digitized betacam with deck control. It’s like $40.
People working with SDI machines need the $2k-$4k solutions. If you’re working with old analog and mostly file ingest, then oddly enough, the cheapest solutions are actually more appropriate (right connectors for VHS for example) and extremely more affordable.
-
Shane Ross
February 27, 2012 at 6:00 pmI’m with Brett. The Decklink stuff does do some things in software (upconverting, for example), but the MXO2 line does everything in hardware, just like the AJA hardware. The ONLY AJA hardware that takes on more duties than normal is the AJA IO HD…that converts to ProRes internally, making it ideal for laptops…running FCP Legacy. But other than that, the AJA IO XT and Matrox MXO2 line do all the same things in hardware.
AJA has better tech support and a better record with stability…thus the price difference.
Shane
Little Frog Post
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Bret Williams
February 27, 2012 at 6:02 pmWell, it doesn’t exist yet. But it does. Since they just released the extreme 3 months late, I wouldnt hold my breath.
-
Jerry Hofmann
February 27, 2012 at 6:04 pmI’ve asked the manufactures this very question about where the processing happens. It’s in board on the AJA box only in the above mentioned boxes.
You’d need the analog to SDI converters to use an Io XT was what I thought I said. The others have analog inputs.
But still, none of them allow for the extra computer display via TB connection. None of them loops the TB connection save the AJA box, right?
Jerry
Apple Certified Trainer, Producer, Writer, Director Editor, Gun for Hire and other things. I ski. My Blog: https://blogs.creativecow.net/Jerry-Hofmann
Current DVD:
https://store.creativecow.net/p/81/jerry_hofmanns_final_cut_system_setup8-Core 3.0 Intel Mac Pro, Dual 2 gig G5, AJA Kona SD, AJA Kona 2, Huge Systems Array UL3D, AJA Io HD, 17″ MBP, Matrox MXO2 with MAX – Cinema Displays I have a 22″ that I paid 4k for still working. G4 with Kona SD card, and SCSI card.
-
Shane Ross
February 27, 2012 at 6:12 pm[Jerry Hofmann] “But still, none of them allow for the extra computer display via TB connection. None of them loops the TB connection save the AJA box, right?”
That is true.
And what “processing” are we talking about exactly?
Shane
Little Frog Post
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up