Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › Compressor 3 or Nattress Converter?
-
Compressor 3 or Nattress Converter?
Graeme Nattress replied 14 years, 5 months ago 10 Members · 15 Replies
-
Nicholas Bierzonski
April 25, 2007 at 12:22 pmWow! Alichek Thanks for posting that link that was very kind of you. There’s nothing like side by side comparison.
-Nicholas Bierzonski
Editor/DVD Author/Java Boy
http://www.finalfocusvideo.com -
Graeme Nattress
April 25, 2007 at 1:21 pmThanks! Remember that I always ask people to try the demo out for themselves and email me if they have any problems. I’m here to help (and pretty quick too if I’m not travelling).
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
Bob Roberts
April 25, 2007 at 4:34 pm“slightly biased” — that’s funny.
Fortunately, you put out great products. So your favoritism is well founded. Keep up the good work!
-
Simon Bergman vázquez
November 27, 2011 at 8:53 pmHello
How did you do the conversion, im trying to convert from NTSC 29,97 to Pal, the material is shoot in CANON D5, H264 compression.
I have exported all my material to Apple Pro Res, and now Im trying to do the conversion. But the ressults, are very bad. With frames that have spooky double images if I put the Nattress plugin on progressive, or a very bad interlaced material if I say to the plugin to export interlaced.
Could anybody help?
Simon
-
Graeme Nattress
November 27, 2011 at 9:05 pmCanon 5D2 is progressive 30p and that doesn’t convert very well to anything else. Your best bet is probably compressor, but don’t be too disappointed if it doesn’t come out totally best.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up