Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Compressor 3 or Nattress Converter?

  • Nicholas Bierzonski

    April 25, 2007 at 12:22 pm

    Wow! Alichek Thanks for posting that link that was very kind of you. There’s nothing like side by side comparison.

    -Nicholas Bierzonski
    Editor/DVD Author/Java Boy
    http://www.finalfocusvideo.com

  • Graeme Nattress

    April 25, 2007 at 1:21 pm

    Thanks! Remember that I always ask people to try the demo out for themselves and email me if they have any problems. I’m here to help (and pretty quick too if I’m not travelling).

    Graeme

    http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP

  • Bob Roberts

    April 25, 2007 at 4:34 pm

    “slightly biased” — that’s funny.

    Fortunately, you put out great products. So your favoritism is well founded. Keep up the good work!

  • Simon Bergman vázquez

    November 27, 2011 at 8:53 pm

    Hello

    How did you do the conversion, im trying to convert from NTSC 29,97 to Pal, the material is shoot in CANON D5, H264 compression.

    I have exported all my material to Apple Pro Res, and now Im trying to do the conversion. But the ressults, are very bad. With frames that have spooky double images if I put the Nattress plugin on progressive, or a very bad interlaced material if I say to the plugin to export interlaced.

    Could anybody help?

    Simon

  • Graeme Nattress

    November 27, 2011 at 9:05 pm

    Canon 5D2 is progressive 30p and that doesn’t convert very well to anything else. Your best bet is probably compressor, but don’t be too disappointed if it doesn’t come out totally best.

    Graeme

    http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP

Page 2 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy