Activity › Forums › DaVinci Resolve › Benchmarks wanted, please participate!
-
Benchmarks wanted, please participate!
Pepijn Klijs replied 12 years, 2 months ago 6 Members · 19 Replies
-
Helge Tjelta
July 5, 2012 at 7:37 pmJust got some info from a colleage, at his place they have an full DaVinci, turnkey system… and guess what… its not that fast at all…. BUT a very nice controller.
DaVinci 8.2 Linux, 24GB RAM, 50TB NEXsan E18 10gbit/s
with 1 Nvidia S4 2200 rack mount GPU
Numbers of blur nodes in realtime: 24Without the Nvidia S4 (which is 4 Quadra FX 5800 cards in parallel) it does only 8 blur nodes…
So time for BMD to open up for some other cards on the mac….
Turns out that a regular macpro with cubix 4, and one redrocket and 3 GTX cards will do alot more…
/helge
-
Rohit Gupta
July 6, 2012 at 6:27 amThe S4 (4 x 5800) is a 2008/2009 configuration. The newer systems with faster GPUs are a lot faster of course.
-
Sascha Haber
July 6, 2012 at 2:59 pmI guess you are making a lot of people REALLY happy with system audio.
PS..Did you get my system details from the “other” thread ?
A slice of color…
DaVinci 8.2.1 OSX 10.7.2
MacPro 5.1 2×2,4 24GB
RAID0 8TB
GTX 470 / Quadro 4000
Extreme 3D+ICA Instructor
https://www.icolorist.com/Sascha.html -
Sascha Haber
July 6, 2012 at 3:13 pmWait a minute…
When you say, 11 nodes of blur, does that mean you are creating them manually by setting blur to max only ?
If so then that is less stress the candle test does.
I created with blurred mask blur nodes, those are almost double as heavy.
Would it be possible to run the Standard Candle test on your side and post the results for the 8 versions, please ?here my latest tests on my trustworthy home system with Quadro4000 UI and GTX 470 GPU
V1 2 nodes : 24 fps
V2 4 nodes : 24 fps
V3 6 nodes : 23 fps
V4 12 nod. : 13 fps
V5 NR 4 : 24 fps
V6 NR 4 : 18 fps
V7 NR 4 : 9 fps
V8 NR 4 : 3 fpsA slice of color…
DaVinci 8.2.1 OSX 10.7.2
MacPro 5.1 2×2,4 24GB
RAID0 8TB
GTX 470 / Quadro 4000
Extreme 3D+ICA Instructor
https://www.icolorist.com/Sascha.html -
Helge Tjelta
July 6, 2012 at 8:41 pmThanks Rohit for the info… do you by any chance have info of the newer systems ?
would be nice to know how the linux systems has evolved?
/Helge
Helge
-
Pepijn Klijs
August 1, 2012 at 6:58 amResolve 9 seems to boost performance. I went from 12 realtime blur nodes to 16, ofcourse with the same setup.
Editor/Colorist, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
http://www.pepijnklijs.nl -
Timo Teravainen
August 10, 2012 at 10:29 pmPepjin, are you using a video output card or not? They tend to slow down frame rates..
-
Dmitry Kitsov
August 11, 2012 at 6:31 am26 nodes at 24 fps/ 29 nodes at 22 fps
Win 64
Xeon 5690 on SR-2
48Gb
1x q4000, 2x GTX580 3GB -
Pepijn Klijs
August 11, 2012 at 8:25 amHi Timo,
You’re right, I didn’t have an output card by that time, but now I do, a decklink sdi.
Just did the same ol test with v9b2 and I’m getting 18 nodes of blur now. Nice improvement!
Editor/Colorist, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
http://www.pepijnklijs.nl
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up