Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

  • Jeremy Garchow

    February 6, 2015 at 1:19 pm

    [TImothy Auld] “FCPX has not seen a significant update in more than two years”

    I get that you don’t like/trust/care for Apple, but this is false.

  • Jeremy Garchow

    February 6, 2015 at 7:52 pm

    [Justin Crowell] “Wait, is this sarcasm?”

    yes

  • Justin Crowell

    February 6, 2015 at 7:53 pm

    anddddddddddd I’m humiliated. Excuse my deletion.

    Editor, Motion Graphics Designer, Director
    JustinCrowell.com

  • Thomas Mathai

    February 7, 2015 at 1:08 am

    >>If they do, I think they are waiting for a youtube kind of delivery world for all media. And in my estimation that is still about twenty years away.<< That's been available for already a number of years. It may not be universally adopted, but it's readily available.

  • Charlie Austin

    February 7, 2015 at 1:47 am

    I’m not worried about it… 🙂

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Jim Wiseman

    February 7, 2015 at 4:08 am

    You CAN store your photos off line (local storage) or in iCloud. iCloud is not required. If you use iCloud, all of your devices will automatically sync to the latest accepted edit in Photos. That is the main advantage of iCloud usage. Not a great model for large RAW images, but for jpgs it could be an advantage as you do not have to manually sync your iPad, MacBook, or iPhone versions. Very good for showing portfolios, targeted projects, etc., no matter which device you have with you.

    But you do NOT have to use iCloud for storage if you don’t want. I have several Aperture managed Libraries, one is 750GB. That would not be practical to load to iCloud, obviously. I will definitely be giving Photos a try, but will also keep a system or two for Aperture well into the future. It’s DAM is far superior to any other, and it works the way I think, no jumping between modules as with LightRoom.

    BTW, Aperture will be supported at least through Yosemite, and is continuing to be sold at this time. I have versions of it running on 10.6.8 through latest Mavericks, will be adding a Yosemite boot drive to my 2012 MacPro for the 3.6 latest version of Aperture probably this week. Will upgrade that drive to Yosemite 10.10.3 that will include Photos when Photos is released, supposedly April, certainly before summer. I think that should hold me for a while. Also take a look look at Capture One by Phase One, it will have much better import of Aperture Libraries than LightRoom, and will allow you to still keep your Aperture Libraries intact and usable.

    Jim Wiseman
    Sony PMW-EX1, Pana AJ-D810 DVCPro, DVX-100, Nikon D7000, Final Cut Pro X 10.1.4, Final Cut Studio 2 and 3, Media 100 Suite 2.1.5, Premiere Pro CS 5.5 and 6.0, AJA ioHD, AJA Kona LHi, Blackmagic Ultrastudio 4K, Blackmagic Teranex, Avid MC, 2013 Mac Pro Hexacore, 1 TB SSD, 64GB RAM, 2-D500: 2012 Hexacore MacPro 3.33 Ghz 24Gb RAM GTX-285 120GB SSD, Macbook Pro 17″ 2011 2.2 Ghz Quadcore i7 16GB RAM 250GB SSD

Page 3 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy