Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › Anyone tried this?
-
Rafael Amador
November 29, 2012 at 8:04 amSHAKE still being the best tool available for up/downscaling on Mac.
If you see a copy to sell on eBay, don’t hesitate to buy it. Even if just for this task its really worth.
rafael -
Bryan Mailer
November 29, 2012 at 10:00 amIf one is upscaling interlaced DV footage using the Compressor method, into ‘best impression of HD’ footage, at what point in the process should de-interlacing be applied?
Prior to conversion? After but before editing? Only when editing is done and before exporting the final product?
-
Rafael Amador
November 29, 2012 at 12:01 pm[Bryan Mailer] “If one is upscaling interlaced DV footage using the Compressor method, into ‘best impression of HD’ footage, at what point in the process should de-interlacing be applied?”
If you are delivering Progressive, the most logical would be deinterlacing in Compressor at the same time you upscale the footage.
If you deinterlace after editing, it wouldn’t make no difference on the plain video, but graphics and other elements (animations, transitions) that have been rendered Interlaced, would need to be deinterlaced too and would lose quality.
Better to edit on a Progressive sequence and make the rendering Progresssive.
rafael -
Alexander Kallas
November 29, 2012 at 11:35 pmHi Raf,
how do these sweeteners compare with Innobits Video Purifier when delivering for m2v.?Cheers
Alexander -
Rafael Amador
November 30, 2012 at 1:51 amHi Alexander,
I ran my tests long ago (FC, Compressor, Purifier, SHAKE), and I can’t remember wich position scored Purifier.
SHAKE beat by far all of them and didn’t make further test. I stick with SHAKE for every single up/downscale. In fact nowadays I only use it for that.
rafael
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up