Activity › Forums › Adobe After Effects › Anamorphic or Square Pixels?
-
Darby Edelen
March 5, 2013 at 4:08 pmAs far as I know the only reason to render anamorphic is if the display device is expecting anamorphic (widescreen NTSC or an anamorphic projector). Otherwise square pixels make me happier all around.
Darby Edelen
-
Simon Roughan
March 5, 2013 at 4:48 pmThanks for the answer Dave. I know, its no skin off my nose.
I’m just someone who likes to know why.The more I learn, the more I realise how little I know.
-
Conrad Olson
March 5, 2013 at 6:34 pmI haven’t used an Avid for a long time but I know it used to convert anything that you imported into the format that the project was set to. This can be slow, and if you get the settings wrong you have to re-import your media, you can’t just change the interpretation, like you can in After Effects.
If the resolution is wrong then Avid will re-scale the media to fit. I’m sure After Effects will do a better job at this so you may as well render the correct format out of AE.
As for having more resolution in a square pixel image, this is true but if you are working in an anamorphic project then you are never going to deliver these extra pixels. You will have to lose them and convert to none square pixels at some point. If it doesn’t happen in AE then it is going to happen in the Avid or at the export/master to tape stage. You may as well do it at the point that gives the best result, or makes the rest of the workflow easier.
I know that the way that Avid deal with media has changed in the past few years so I don’t know if this is still the case.
—
-
Jared Yearsley
July 21, 2013 at 11:18 pmBeen trying to find a thread like this for a while!
So, earlier in the year I switched to creating all my SD comps in square pixels (1050×576) instead of FHA (720×576 widescreen) in AE.
I should’ve really got permission from our Head editor, but it just made sense to me. HD outputs are square pixels, so really it’s just the smaller equivalent.Plus, as others have said above, more pixels = more information. And, as someone else said, it only matters if the ouput display is expecting anamorphic pixels.
Basically, I’ve been trying to find a forum or something so I can share with our department and change our workflow to square pixels. Been looking for the ‘WHY’ reason, like the OP.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up