Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › 20% of previous FCPX users moving to Premiere/Windows
-
20% of previous FCPX users moving to Premiere/Windows
Steve Connor replied 12 years ago 11 Members · 42 Replies
-
Tim Wilson
July 29, 2014 at 9:48 pm[Charlie Austin] “Of former FCP X users moving? Or former FC 1-7 users moving. The latter I’ll buy in a heartbeat. The former I’d need a cite.”
The latter, absolutely.
Although I guess it depends how you’d count a “former FCPX user,” right? How long would they have had to try it before bailing in order to count?
But in general, I do think there’s a high incidence of people who saw what they needed to from the combination of 5 or 6 years without a meaningful FCLegend update, the early releases of X, and a not exciting Mac Pro. Making no value judgements myself (for once). Just an observation…
…but I do have some questions myself about the relationship between X, switching and other NLEs three years into this. The sociologist in me wishes that there had been a way to track the changes along the way….in a more substantive manner than this subject line. LOL
-
Jeff Kay
July 29, 2014 at 9:52 pmI don’t know about the supermodels, but I do know for certain that 203% of Nigerian princes want to transfer millions of dollars into my bank account.
-
Charlie Austin
July 29, 2014 at 9:55 pm[Tim Wilson] “But in general, I do think there’s a high incidence of people who saw what they needed to from the combination of 5 or 6 years without a meaningful FCLegend update, the early releases of X, and a not exciting Mac Pro.”
And I’d agree. They probably should have waited a little longer. 😉 What I don’t agree with is the title of this thread topic. Though it is a clever way to have that nugget of made up info appear in google search results. Well done Gary! lol I think I’ll start a “39% of previous Avid users switch to FCP X” thread to counter. 🙂
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~ -
Gary Huff
July 29, 2014 at 10:05 pm[Charlie Austin] “I think I’ll start a “39% of previous Avid users switch to FCP X” thread to counter. :-)”
Only 39%? I think you can imagine a bigger number than that! 😀
-
Aindreas Gallagher
July 29, 2014 at 10:06 pmah jesus – i swear to you – I did actually write – ‘but when that camera was overhead what the hell. were they kicking them?’
but then i deleted it. I do regret that now.also those things are not lemmings; they’re tribbles. In the atlantic.
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
Gary Huff
July 29, 2014 at 10:06 pm[Jeff Kay] “From the same place as most of the comments here, such as FCX users outnumbering other NLE users.”
Send me your address for your free cigar!
-
Marcus Moore
July 29, 2014 at 11:52 pmI brought the previous article in for discussion- I’m the one who was able to have a civil discussion about its potential issues… and I’m the one who to took the initiate to go direct to the author of the original charts and get his very reasoned take on how it was put together and the margins for error.
You’re just being silly.
-
Gary Huff
July 30, 2014 at 2:12 am[Marcus Moore] “You’re just being silly.”
Oh now, Marcus, come on. Discuss away. It’s just as pertinent as your made-up numbers.
-
Marcus Moore
July 30, 2014 at 2:33 amYou mean the number I said I was making up?
When Franz said FCP X’s “over 1 million users” meant an average of 300K per year, I agreed with him. That’s some pretty straight math. But it didn’t jive with the info presented in the original article.
I’m trying to imagine what I’ve suggested that’s so outlandish.
With FCP X (like CC Premier) being relatively early in it’s life, I wondered if it was an escalating curve. Whether it’s new users, or some legacy users not migrating until recent feature additions, a growing adoption curve was one idea I was positing to try and square the data presented in the chart. The one that comes from TWO external sources, neither of them me.
As it turns out it didn’t add up, even with very backloaded sales.
I posited, argued against, and ultimately disproved erroneous info by fact checking.
Yup, my blinders are firmly on…
-
Gary Huff
July 30, 2014 at 2:58 am[Marcus Moore] “I posited, argued against, and ultimately disproved erroneous info by fact checking.”
That’s fine. But when pointed out:
[Marcus Moore] “It’s called a discussion forum for some reason… Hmmmm.”
[Marcus Moore] ” In this case talking about where the data might be going wrong. But you’re right, of course… [insert eyes rolling]”
So, in full “eye rolling” mode…right back at ya.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up