Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro HDV rendered to HD or HD rendered to HD?

  • HDV rendered to HD or HD rendered to HD?

    Posted by Dale Spetz on September 18, 2007 at 2:13 pm

    1920 x 1080i is what I need to output.

    Can I achieve the same quality output by editing with captured HDV files (1440 x 1080), then rendering with Neo-HD 1920 x 1080…

    as opposed to…

    editing with Neo-HD captured files (1920 x 1080), then rendering again with Neo-HD 1920 x 1080?

    My initial experiments tell me that I will get better results by working with the 1920 x 1080 Neo-HD captured files. Some of my HDV (Vegas7) captured files have edge-jaggies, where Neo-HD captured files seem to smooth these edges out. The HDV captured “jaggies” seem to persist, even after rendered out with Neo-HD. However, I may admittedly have something set wrong.

    I hope that this makes sense, but the gist of it is: I would far prefer to edit with the smaller HDV files, then output render into 1920 x 1080s. But, not if there is a quality compromise.

    Has anyone else compared the two outputs?

    Dale Spetz replied 18 years, 11 months ago 2 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Dale Spetz

    September 18, 2007 at 3:58 pm

    Well, I see now that I had my “project settings” set to “upper field”, which created my HDV jaggies. Now, set to “lower field” they are smoothed out.

    Now, I cannot say that I see any significant quality difference between HDV(1440)edit-to-HDrender and HD(1920)edit-to-HDrender. This is good, as I far prefer editing with the smaller HDV(1440) files.

    Does anyone else have any experience/input on what is their preferred route to 1920 x 1080 output?

    Thanks!

  • Douglas Spotted eagle

    September 18, 2007 at 4:39 pm

    If you are outputting for BD or HD DVD, you can choose either AVCHD or MPEG formats.
    If you’re simply rendering to HDV for print-back or for HDD playback, the file will be UFF. HDV is UFF.

  • Dale Spetz

    September 18, 2007 at 4:50 pm

    Thanks for the input, Douglas.

    My final output is for eventual HD broadcast, so I purchased Neo-HD, in hopes that its 1920 output can eventually be transferred to HD Cam.

    But, my main question is: Is there a output quality difference whether I edit in HDV(1440) or HD(Neo-HD captured 1920)? In both scenarios, I output render useing Neo-HD. It appears to me that the final product quality will be the same, in both edit scenarios. I am curious if others have experienced the same.

    It, therefore, would seem preferrable to edit with the smaller HDV(1440) files. But, am I wrong about this?

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy