Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Broadcasting Field Dominance ??

  • Field Dominance ??

    Posted by Kevin Reinicke on March 4, 2009 at 12:25 am

    Hey guys,

    I shot a music video on the HVX200 in 720p 24p (1280×720) and need to deliver both in PAL and NTSC for satellite broadcast. When rendering from Vegas to 720×576 interlaced (PAL) or 720×480 interlaced (NTSC), im not sure abt the Field dominance, is it upper field or lower field first????

    Also: in order to preserve the 16:9 aspect ratio of the video, do I have to set the pixel aspect ratio to 1,093 ???

    Thanxs guys,

    K.R.

    Asmund Voll tesdal replied 17 years, 4 months ago 3 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Kevin Reinicke

    March 4, 2009 at 8:23 am

    Dave,

    thank you so much for your answer,

    I shot in 23,976 and abt your question: I would rather like the video to be seen on a 4:3 screen with letterbox.

    abt the framerate: for NTSC the vid is on its 1280×720 progressive timeline that I worked with and I render it out to 720×480 i and no matter what I do, Sony Vegas always gives me lower field first.

    abt PAL: I never really got how to conform a file in sony vegas, so my rendering to 720×576 i PAL didnt used to look good. I opened to the final output (1280×720 p) in quick time pro und exported it out to PAL 720×576 i and it looks GREAT ! a very good conversion from 23,976 p to 25 frames interlaced. The file is upper field first though.

    so now I have a NTSC version 720×480 i at 29,97 and lower field first

    and

    a PAL version 720×576 i at 25 and upper field first.

    does that make any sense??

  • Mike Smith

    March 4, 2009 at 9:07 am

    The PAL depends a bit what format / codec you are using.

    PAL is normally upper field first, apart from the DV family of formats (DV, DVCAM, DVCPro) which are lower field first.

    Except Matrox produced a DV codec with upper field first that was in use with some of their hardware for a while .. which is non-standard, not supported by anyone else, may have largely died out.

  • Asmund Voll tesdal

    March 5, 2009 at 6:13 pm

    [Kevin Reinicke] “I would rather like the video to be seen on a 4:3 screen with letterbox.”

    Did you check with whoever is broadcasting this? Some places here in PAL-land, at least, prefer anamorphic.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy