Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe After Effects AE Advantages over Motion?

  • AE Advantages over Motion?

    Posted by Nate Hanson on May 16, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    I teach a high school multimedia course and I have access to both After Effects and Motion. I’m wondering if there would be any reason to teach both programs.

    This year I only taught AE – mostly because there were so many great (free) resources available that I was able to learn the software fairly quickly. I haven’t seen much in the way of free training for Motion and I don’t know how to use the software yet.

    1) Are there any advantages to using AE over Motion or do they both offer basically the same tools?

    2) Which is more commonly used in “the industry”?

    Thanks for your professional opinions!

    Nate

    Ken Latman replied 18 years ago 4 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Ron Coy

    May 16, 2008 at 3:49 pm

    that’s a matter of debate… a can of worms I’m afraid to open myself.

    On this forum, you’ll likely hear After Effects as the choice. Well, duh. It’s an After Effects forum.

    I don’t use Motion much yet. I am familiar and comfortable with the After Effects interface and toolset. However, there are REALLY cool built in functions of Motion (especially the latest version) that I could utilize much faster and easier than I can do things in After Effects. You can look at the Motion page on Apple’s website for videos that show some of the capabilities of the program.

    That being said, I think that After Effects is definitely more powerful. It is more flexible, offers more control over everything, and has a ton of very useful plugins and filters, and a ton of resources (that didn’t exist when I first started with it) that make learning it much easier. Well, maybe not easier to learn than Motion, but certainly cheaper.

    Easier to use does not equal better. Motion can do some cool stuff quickly, and it has a bright future as a compositing program for non-compositors (meaning video editors can pick it up more easily than using After Effects IMHO), but if you want to do really awesome stuff, with a rock solid toolset… can’t beat After Effects.

  • Joey Burnham

    May 16, 2008 at 6:50 pm

    Agreed.

    Alhough Motion does have some nifty things that AE doesn’t. Some replicators, and particle efx, personally I think they are just that…nifty.

    Keyframing can be a painful process in my opinion in Motion and it really can hog computer resources.

    Plus, VERY limited resources for help issues and tutorials.

    Stick with AE.

  • Nate Hanson

    May 16, 2008 at 7:16 pm

    [Ron Coy] “On this forum, you’ll likely hear After Effects as the choice.”

    Yep, I figured that. So I posted a similar message in the Motion forum to get a “balanced” response.

    Thanks for the responses guys – very helpful so far. Any more opinions out there?

    Nate

  • Ken Latman

    May 16, 2008 at 8:06 pm

    One other consideration in the debate would be the fact that Motion does not run on a windows PC.
    Though I am a mac fan, your students may want to explore one of the applications out of class and AE would provide somewhat of a level playing field.
    You can always use Motion projects within AE and treat it as a plug-in for those quick particles and behavior type effects.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy