Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy 2.66 vs 2.8 for FCP

  • 2.66 vs 2.8 for FCP

    Posted by Shaun Michael on January 12, 2011 at 7:35 am

    Is there going to be a big difference in speed between the 2.66 i7 macbook pro and the 2.8 i7 for final cut editing? Or should I save the extra few hundred bucks and put it towards something else?

    Thanks

    Russell Lasson replied 15 years, 7 months ago 5 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Thomas Morter-laing

    January 12, 2011 at 9:58 am

    Not much difference- obviously it’s going to be a little faster, but I’d HIGHLY doubt the difference would be perceptible. Do you really need a laptop? And i mean actually think about that one, we here SOOO many people who are like “yeah i need the portability blah blah blah” (basically trying to convince themselves, when actually their travel is limited and they just want the coolness of it).
    If you’re going to need to take it to other offices/ studios every now and again, I would look at an iMac. For that amount of money you can get a MUCH better computer, the imac having far more processor power and graphics power etc. Just some food for thought…

    😀
    Tom Morter-Laing
    Freelance Editor
    Certified Apple Product Proffessional, 2010
    http://www.depictproductions.co.uk

    Sony Z5, with Rode NTG2.
    iMac 27″ intel i7 2.93GHz, 12GB RAM, ATI HD5750 [1GB GDDR5], 2TB Int. SATA with 2TB External HDD; (FW800), with Elgato Turbo H264HD.

  • Rafael Amador

    January 12, 2011 at 10:51 am

    Little of big difference, but being a MBP a limited machine, a 2,66 will be more limiting than a 2,88.
    I have a 2,66, If a I could i I would ge the 2.88.

    [Thomas Morter-Laing] “And i mean actually think about that one, we here SOOO many people who are like “yeah i need the portability blah blah blah” (basically trying to convince themselves, when actually their travel is limited and they just want the coolness of it).”
    That’s true.
    If you are sure that you won’t ever need that mobility, a MBP makes no sense.
    If you have to edit some time out of your place, a MBP is the only solution.
    A big problem with MBPs is the screen size. You can not work long time there without ending using glasses.
    rafael

    http://www.nagavideo.com

  • Walter Biscardi

    January 12, 2011 at 11:30 am

    I always say buy the fastest computer you can afford and don’t forget to load up on the RAM. For a laptop, I would fill it with the maximum RAM it takes.

    There will be very little perceptible difference between the two machines in terms of day to day use, but as the software develops over the next few years, you’ll probably wish you had that little bit of extra horsepower.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Editor, Colorist, Director, Writer, Consultant, Author, Chef.
    HD Post and Production
    Biscardi Creative Media

    “Foul Water, Fiery Serpent” Winner, Best Documentary, LA Reel Film Festival.

    Blog Twitter Facebook

  • Russell Lasson

    January 12, 2011 at 5:15 pm

    The big difference is between the i7 and the i5. The difference between the 2.66 and the 2.8 isn’t a big deal. Definitely max out the RAM though. I suggest Crucial.com instead of Apple for RAM as it can save quite a bit of money.

    Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Colorist/Digital Cinema Specialist
    Color Mill
    Salt Lake City, UT
    http://www.colormill.net

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy