Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy best (most popular) capture codec

  • best (most popular) capture codec

    Posted by Jason Brown on December 30, 2009 at 1:54 pm

    Hey Guys,

    I’ve been using the HDV codec to capture to. It’s been effective for what we are doing. It’s captured with a Canon XLH1 so it’s originally HDV on tape. I’m capturing through firewire from the camera itself.

    I’m just wondering if I should be using a different codec. I’ve also captured to DVCPRO HD and ProRes…just wondering what you guys capture to. (I also have access to the Matrox codecs…but my thought is only to capture to those through the matrox box)

    The final output will be file delivery (WMV, h264, etc) and SD-DVD…there won’t be any heavy compositing or color correction…just some basic overlays and maybe some cropping with side-by-side power point slides.

    Thanks,

    -Jason

    Walter Biscardi replied 16 years, 8 months ago 4 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • David Bogie

    December 30, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    The most popular codec is DV. Heck, we shoot on our Panny HVX170 in 1080/60i but we can’t use it for anything so we store it for future use but bring it in as DV for editing.

    The best codec is whatever you think you need to maintain your subjective impression of image, motion, and color quality while staying within the limits of your machine’s ability to process in your subjective impression of time.

    There’s absolutely no reason to over-resolve your stated output codecs which all have varying format settings so it’s still completely subjective. Use whatever you want to use.

    bogiesan

  • Alan Okey

    December 30, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    If you’re not adding a lot of text or graphics or doing any extensive color correction, and if your system doesn’t bog down when editing HDV, then there’s no compelling reason for you to change your workflow. “If it ain’t broke…”

    Variables that might alter your decision would be the addition of lots of graphics/text, doing extensive compositing/color correction or adding lots of filters. In that case, ProRes would be a better choice.

  • Jason Brown

    December 30, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    Great…that helps.

    Thanks.

  • Walter Biscardi

    December 31, 2009 at 2:50 pm

    [Alan Okey] “Variables that might alter your decision would be the addition of lots of graphics/text, doing extensive compositing/color correction or adding lots of filters. In that case, ProRes would be a better choice.”

    Unless of course you plan to go back to HDV tape. Then anything you’ve gained going to ProRes gets wiped out when it’s laid back to HDV tape.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Editor, Colorist, Director, Writer, Consultant, Author.
    HD Post and Production
    Biscardi Creative Media

    “Foul Water, Fiery Serpent” now in Post.

    Creative Cow Forum Host:
    Apple Final Cut Pro, Apple Motion, Apple Color, AJA Kona, Business & Marketing, Maxx Digital.

    Blog!

    Twitter!

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy