Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Latest MacPros

  • Posted by Paul Witcher on August 26, 2009 at 5:27 pm

    I know the advice is always buy the best you can afford, but does anyone have any experience of the difference in speed between the new Quad Core’s 2.26GHz or 2.66GHz? The reason I ask is I’m about to shell out more then £5000 (UK) for a MacPro 12Meg memory etc, snow leopard, FCP 3 and the price difference between the 2.26 and 2.66 here in the UK is over £1000 – the question is, is it worth it?

    Thanks for any advice you can give

    Michael Craven replied 16 years, 8 months ago 7 Members · 8 Replies
  • 8 Replies
  • Dennis Dean

    August 26, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    Hi Paul – no experience with that specific configuration but I’ve always found your money is best put to RAM when the clock speed difference is fractional. Bus speed is also important, as you no doubt know. Are there differences there? Finally – speed is relative. If it’s been awhile since you’ve installed near CPUs – you’ll probably be thrilled with either unit. Save the quid for a good brown pub ale and your favorite mate…. 🙂

    dd

    Dennis Dean
    The Dean Group
    -It’s about results-
    http://www.deangroup.com

  • Russell Lasson

    August 26, 2009 at 5:45 pm

    Are you comparing the Quad 2.66 to the eight-core 2.26? Both are good computers, but I would strongly suggest the eight core machine if you’ll be dealing with processor intensive workflows. Compressor will utilize the extra processors and I doubt you’ll regret it.

    That is, unless you lose your home because you spent the extra money on a computer.

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Colorist/Digital Cinema Specialist
    Color Mill
    Salt Lake City, UT
    http://www.colormill.net

  • David Roth weiss

    August 26, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    As Russell said, eight cores are a wise investment, but in terms of processor speed, the huge premium charged for the “top of the line” procs is really not a great investment unless you have loads of cash lying around and you need a biger tax write off.

    David Roth Weiss
    Director/Editor
    David Weiss Productions, Inc.
    Los Angeles

    POST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™

    A forum host of Creative COW’s Apple Final Cut Pro, Business & Marketing, Indie Film & Documentary, and Film History & Appreciations forums.

  • Paul Witcher

    August 26, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    Hi Russell,

    They are both the 8 cores – my feeling is to save the dosh and buy more memory??

  • Russell Lasson

    August 26, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    I agree with David that processor speed isn’t worth the extra money right now.

    I would much rather spend the money on a super nice SSD for a start up disk. I’ve heard really great things from that.

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Colorist/Digital Cinema Specialist
    Color Mill
    Salt Lake City, UT
    http://www.colormill.net

  • Craig Russillroy

    August 26, 2009 at 6:07 pm

    Guys the 4 cores are really 8 and the 8 cores are really 16 cores due to hyper threading – only on the new macs – compressor sees all of the processors -well cool !!!!

    Celebrating 20 years in the wonderful world of POST … from 2 inch to 4K

  • Ed Dooley

    August 27, 2009 at 2:29 pm
  • Michael Craven

    August 27, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    And also realize that you will pay a premium for RAM ordered directly from Apple. You can find it at 3rd party vendors for a fraction of the price.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy