-
To transcode, or not to transcode DV?
On my last project I shot in DV, I did all my edits in FCP6 with the codec set to DV, and round-tripped the clips that needed FX into Motion 3. After the round trips the footage needed to be rendered in FCP to play ‘smoothly’ (it played in unlimited RT, but choppy), but after the render it looked heavily compressed, and looked doubly compressed after I output to DVD or Quicktime files. After experimenting it turned out I got the best final output by not rendering the motion files in FCP at all, and leaving them whatever in codec motion worked in natively (which I believe was “animation”) and just suffering with choppy playback in the edit.
My next project will be very similar with regards to using motion for the FX and may also require heavier handed color correction than the last one. Would I be better off transcoding my DV footage to another codec (such as animation, or ProRes) after logging it and using the matching compressor for my FCP sequence? I would hope there’s a better option than the workflow I used last time. I searched the COW forums and found some answers regarding CC and ProRes, but not as specific to my issue as I would like.Your input is appreciated.
Thanks,
Andy