Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › Cutting down render time
-
Cutting down render time
Posted by Dustin Park on April 30, 2008 at 4:26 pmSystem: Mac Pro 2 X 3.2 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
4GB 800 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM
ATTO 4GB Fiber Channel Card
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
4TB Rorke Galaxy HDX
Final Cut Pro 6.0.3So, we’re editing in uncompressed HD. A five minute, five video stream sequence takes 45 minutes to an hour to render. Is there any way of cutting down on this render time? Also is there any way to view the sequence, without having to render it after every change?
Rafael Amador replied 18 years, 4 months ago 8 Members · 9 Replies -
9 Replies
-
Shane Ross
April 30, 2008 at 5:12 pmWhat are you rendering? I mean, you told us the format you are using, but what are you doing that requires a render? Adding a filter? Some filters require lots of processing, and some (FX Plug) also use the Graphics Card to speed up rendering. So a better graphics card would help.
But it would help to know what you are doing that requires you to render.
Shane
GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD now for sale!
http://www.LFHD.net
Read my blog! -
Fred Miller
April 30, 2008 at 5:21 pmYou can change your sequence settings to render at 8 bit. That will speed it up a bit. Once the program is final and you’re ready to master. Change your settings back to 10 bit and re-render. That’ll speed up your workflow at least. I use this process when editing at HD PRORES HQ and it’s almost a 3 to 1 render time ratio between the two settings.
FCP Studio 2
Dual 3Gg Quad Core
5Gg RAM
KONA 2
OS 10.4.11 -
David Roth weiss
April 30, 2008 at 5:22 pm[Dustin Park] “is there any way to view the sequence, without having to render it after every change?”
I’ll go a step farther than Shane and suggest that it sounds as if your timeline settings do not match your video source. Given the hardware you’re running, you should certainly be able to get enough realtime performance to keep from having to render every change.
David Roth Weiss
Director/Editor
David Weiss Productions, Inc.
Los AngelesPOST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™
A forum host of Creative COW’s Apple Final Cut Pro, Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums.
-
Dustin Park
April 30, 2008 at 5:40 pmTo answer Shane’s question, the layers are as follows: video shot on green screen, graphic background created in Motion, graphic bug created in motion, graphic lower created in motion and graphic drop box created in motion, drop box contains either a .tiff or more video. The settings are different, but it brings up another question. The video is shot as DVCPRO HD and the graphics have an animation codec, the sequence finally is Apple Pro Res 422. Do they all have to match to ensure playback? Sorry, Avid editor new to FCP.
-
Aaron Neitz
April 30, 2008 at 6:03 pmI can’t say for 100% certain, but I believe rendering Motion templates in Final Cut are EXTREMELY slow. Better to render them out from Motion as Animation + alpha and import into FCP.
Hopefully someone can back me up on that.
-
David Roth weiss
April 30, 2008 at 6:17 pm[Dustin Park] “the layers are as follows: video shot on green screen, graphic background created in Motion, graphic bug created in motion, graphic lower created in motion and graphic drop box created in motion, drop box contains either a .tiff or more video. The settings are different, but it brings up another question. The video is shot as DVCPRO HD and the graphics have an animation codec, the sequence finally is Apple Pro Res 422.”
No wonder Dustin!!! You’ve got a render engine’s worst nightmare… Lots of very processor intensive elements and several different video sources that don’t match the timeline settings. Next time consider working in a timeling that matches the majority of the video footage, then you can switch the compressor settings to ProRes in Sequence settings before a final render. That will give you at least some realtime…
David Roth Weiss
Director/Editor
David Weiss Productions, Inc.
Los AngelesPOST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™
A forum host of Creative COW’s Apple Final Cut Pro, Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums.
-
Jeremy Garchow
April 30, 2008 at 7:22 pmAaron’s got it. If you are bring that motion project into FCP that’s where your hang up is.
-
David Bogie
April 30, 2008 at 9:24 pmI disagree slightly.
I import my Motion projects into FCP in order to SAVE time, not to waste it. But I am very picky about which ones. I always pre-render stuff that won’t change and that I know will be better handled by FCP as a movie. Some Motion projects need to come in as objects to complete timing adjustments or other tweaks.In this particular case:
1. video shot on green screen: Pre-render the foreground, import the movie.
2. graphic background created in Motion: Probably doesn’t matter but textures and stuff are best pre-prendered so they can be stored for future use, too.
3. graphic bug created in motion: Definielty pre-rendered.
4. graphic lower created in motion: Doesn’t really matter unless the text is also animated. Saving lower thirds as templates is a good idea so you can change names easily.
5. graphic drop box created in motion, drop box contains either a .tiff or more video: I’d do this as a live object,but that’s jsut me.bogiesan
This is my standard sigfile so do not take it personally: “For crying out loud, read the freakin’ manual.”
-
Rafael Amador
May 1, 2008 at 7:14 amHi Dustin,
If you need often to integrate graphics from Motion, AE, etc in FC, consider buying “Sheer”.
8/10b Uncompress YCbCr/RGB and always with Alpha channel available.
In the era of the 10b/YCbCr codecs, Animation (8b/RGB) is old-fashioned.Mac OX 10.5.2-FC 6.02-QT 7.4.1
G5 2x2Gh 4GbRAM-BlackMagic Extreme
PMBP 17″Core2Duo 4GbRAM-AJA ioHD
JVC DTV-17″
SONY EX-1 . SONY PD170
..and always a big mess on top of the table.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up
