-
Multicamera improvements in FCP soon?
OK,
I realize this may come with backlash, and if I’m off base then I deserve it but here goes…
I love FCP. I think there is more long term future in FCP right now then in the AVID world. At some point I’m going to have to decide to move forward on a multi-camera project using FCP or AVID. I am in the scripted mulitcamera world and my heart wants me to go FCP but my gut tells me as a newer editor (in multicam) to go with AVID, because FCP for heavy duty multicamera editing because it requires more steps and time to prep at the assist level.
**I want to pause here for a second and say, if I were on a single camera project, it wouldn’t even be a debate for me, I would be using Final Cut pro****
I’m wondering if Apple/FCP are planning on making it’s multi camera interface competitive with AVID in the near future; here is a scenario/problem I will draw up for you.
I’m on a multicamera project. 4 cameras, all jam synched perfectly with Time of day TC
In the world of AVID, assuming I correctly label and name clips in some proper order, I could select a full bin of clips with varying cameras and multi-group them and with one click of the mouse have them grouped by time code in a multi-clip. Any time code breaks are met with black, but all cameras hold their positions in the viewer window as identified by clip names (ending in either A,B,C or 1,2,3). In the end I could have a full day for footage, A camera in the first window, D camera in the fourth window, holding their positions the whole way through “the day”, with no more than 4 windows in the multigroup all corresponding in sync by TC. This is perfect.
In the world FCP with the same scenario (selecting a folder/bin filled with clips), any time code break defaults the next clip into a NEW camera window, meaning EVERY quicktime clip results in a NEW multi-camera window window in the viewer. i.e. If I have 19 clips I have 19 windows, instead of those 19 clips sorting themselves by camera and falling into their respective (4) camera positions by T.O.D. timecode and clip name. Even if I assign numerically correct nomenclature for my clip name, fcp identifies each quicktime as a “new camera”. My only other option is to group new clips by EVERY SINGLE TC break. Turning a process equal to one mouse click in the AVID world to one that takes hours, days and sometimes weeks (depending on the scale of the project) in the world of FCP.
This is a major, major handicap, and one that stops editors from taking advantage of the affordability of an FCP system. Now, with AVID dropping it’s price last month, it’s going to make it harder for editors to take that leap of faith. It’s hard enough to get producers to make sure your material is jam synched, and when it is, (as it always should be) organizing the material should be a cinch. It’s a shame to me FCP does not have this worked out. I would think reality shows would benefit even moreso from this. You could have a day of footage in one clip with every camera at your fingertips!
My questions:
Does anyone of you guys know of way in FCP to group and multiclip your material without having to make a individual group for every time a camera cuts on every quicktime file?
I think if this was remedied, you’d have a faction of AVID editors feeling more comfortable moving over to fcp. This kink makes me very, very uneasy knowing an assist has to dedicate many extra hours to prepping material. In fact, it makes it hard for me to justify to a producer why I should be allowed to use an FCP system in the multicam world.
Also, not that I’m a big fan of it, but are there any plans in the works to have some sort of scripter/script based editing software in fcp down the line. This is a also something giving pause to AVID editors from converting to FCP!
Again, I hope I’m just missing something here, I just want this to work and make final cut better. I enjoy the interface/process of editing in the FCP world I think it is much much more of a natural feel. I hope this is not met with hostility, I’m not an AVID veteran who is resistant to change, I sincerely want to make this a better product.
DM