Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy MacPro 2.8 Octo vs. 3.0 Octo

  • MacPro 2.8 Octo vs. 3.0 Octo

    Posted by Tom Matthies on March 3, 2008 at 9:49 pm

    I’m looking to upgrade my home Final Cut setup and I’m looking for opinions in whether to go with a 2.8 Octo or a 3.0 Octo. I don’t do a lot of heavy lifting on my home machine-no HD at the moment. I usually edit at DV50 on this machine. Is there enough of a difference in performance between these two machines to justify the $800 diference or would I be better off going with the 2.8 and taking the $800 difference and putting it into more RAM for the same price.
    Opinions and debate welcome!
    Tom

    Tom Matthies replied 18 years, 2 months ago 7 Members · 12 Replies
  • 12 Replies
  • Aaron Neitz

    March 3, 2008 at 10:01 pm

    I would take the extra RAM any day of the week

  • Steve Connor

    March 3, 2008 at 10:04 pm

    No point at all in the 3.0 over the 2.8 get the NVidia Graphics card and more RAM instead

    Steve Connor
    Adrenalin Television

    Have you tried “Search Posts”? Enlightenment may be there.

  • Walter Biscardi

    March 3, 2008 at 10:25 pm

    Get the extra RAM and you’re good to go. I would even stick with the base ATI 2600 card.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Biscardi Creative Media
    HD and SD Production for Broadcast and Independent Productions.

    STOP STARING AND START GRADING WITH APPLE COLOR
    The new Color Training DVD now available from the Creative Cow!

    Read my Blog!

  • Shane Ross

    March 3, 2008 at 10:31 pm

    I concur with everyone…2.8 with more RAM. And as Walter said, stick with the Stock card…it is better than you’d expect.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD now for sale!
    http://www.LFHD.net
    Read my blog!

  • Sean Jason

    March 4, 2008 at 10:35 am

    I just want to bring it to the attention of the Creative Cow community that people have been experiencing problems with the new Mac Pros and the ATI 2600 card. I myself have had 2 such crashes in the last 5 weeks, and I’m not sure if I should pursue a replacement before the problem gets worse. See:

    https://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1365277&tstart=15

    https://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=419100

    Opinions? I’m curious what Walter thinks …

    Thanks,

    Sean

  • Tom Matthies

    March 4, 2008 at 2:03 pm

    I was planning on ordering the system, either way, with the Nvidia 8800 card.I will be using Motion and of course Color on this system and I figured that this card would make things run a bit smoother and faster. It seems that more and more processing is being off loaded to the video card these days so I figured that the bigger, the better.
    What card are most of you running in new systems these days?
    Tom

  • Walter Biscardi

    March 4, 2008 at 2:26 pm

    [Tom Matthies] “I was planning on ordering the system, either way, with the Nvidia 8800 card.I will be using Motion and of course Color on this system and I figured that this card would make things run a bit smoother and faster.”

    For Motion, maybe. For Color, the ATI is the way to go right now. ATI cards have always worked better with Color since the Final Touch days. I don’t know why, but they do.

    Steve Jobs prefers nVidia so that’s why they are the “card of choice.” Personally, when we order our new machines, they will have the ATI 2600’s in them unless ATI has come out with a newer and faster card.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Biscardi Creative Media
    HD and SD Production for Broadcast and Independent Productions.

    STOP STARING AND START GRADING WITH APPLE COLOR
    The new Color Training DVD now available from the Creative Cow!

    Read my Blog!

  • Walter Biscardi

    March 4, 2008 at 2:28 pm

    [Sean Jason]
    Opinions? I’m curious what Walter thinks …”

    The folks I know running the systems are not experiencing any issues with the ATI card. That’s all I can comment on. I’ll still be ordering our systems with the ATI 2600.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Biscardi Creative Media
    HD and SD Production for Broadcast and Independent Productions.

    STOP STARING AND START GRADING WITH APPLE COLOR
    The new Color Training DVD now available from the Creative Cow!

    Read my Blog!

  • Craig Seeman

    March 4, 2008 at 3:15 pm

    Barefeats Motion and Barefeats Games did tests on the graphic cards.
    The ATI Radeon cards handle Core Image better which is important for video work.
    The nVidia cards do better with games due to the use OpenGL. Of course if you’ve got apps using OpenGL it might tilt things. I hear Maya artists might have reason fo

  • Shane Ross

    March 4, 2008 at 3:35 pm

    [Tom Matthies] “What card are most of you running in new systems these days?”

    I am running the ATI x1900 XT card in my new MacPro. I had to buy it as an upgrade kit at a local Mac dealer…which is fine as I like having a backup graphics card in case one dies (it has happened)…and I had to have a buddy install it on his OLDER MacPro and install the firmware update. Because when I first installed it…it didn’t work.

    That is a FAST card.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD now for sale!
    http://www.LFHD.net
    Read my blog!

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy