Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy XDCAM vs. HDV Workflow in FCP

  • XDCAM vs. HDV Workflow in FCP

    Posted by Chris Babbitt on November 19, 2007 at 8:40 pm

    Are there any advantages working with XDCAM footage vs. HDV footage in FCP? Of course there is a definite advantage in file transfer time vs. capturing from tape, but what about editing, realtime functionality, rendering, conforming and output?

    Andy Mees replied 18 years, 5 months ago 3 Members · 2 Replies
  • 2 Replies
  • Chris Borjis

    November 20, 2007 at 12:12 am

    [Chris Babbitt] “Are there any advantages working with XDCAM footage vs. HDV footage in FCP?”

    They are kinda the same beast but more bandwidth for XDCAM.

    contrary to popular belief it takes about as long to copy the contents of a full xdcam disc than it does to capture it in realtime. Though I have heard the new transfer software that just came out is supposed to speed that up 2x on the F-70 deck with dual pickup heads.

    For now I capture and post mixed XDCAM HD & HDV timelines as DVCPRO-HD and it works for me. I needed newer features available in the newer xdcam software before I can commit to a total XD workflow.

  • Andy Mees

    November 20, 2007 at 2:48 am

    [Chris Babbitt] “Are there any advantages working with XDCAM footage vs. HDV footage in FCP? Of course there is a definite advantage in file transfer time vs. capturing from tape, but what about editing, realtime functionality, rendering, conforming and output? “

    well the most significant advantage of XDCAM HD over HDV is the quality (at 35 Mb/s VBR)
    additionally, as noted, the file transfer workflow for import is faster than from tape.
    but as to editing, realtime functionality, rendering, conforming and output then there no specific advantage that I’m aware of.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy