Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Stills and Final Cut Pro

  • Stills and Final Cut Pro

    Posted by Cchanez on April 11, 2006 at 6:32 am

    Hello, I am new to this forum and hope to find some answers. We are putting a project together which will contain about 600 photos played for an average of about 5 sec each. Each photo is in JPEG format, 300 dpi, with different sizes the biggest being (w 3300, h 2356 pixels). Each one of these pictures has been imported into a FCP project and now comes the editing process and putting them all on a timeline. My problem resides in which format I should use for the timeline. The end result will be projected on a screen (approx 10 x 7 meters) from a medium either on tape or DVD. Of course we would like to keep the photos to their highest quality. Should I use simple DV, DVCPRO, HDV ???? My equipment includes the following: G5 Dual 2Ghz, 8GB Ram, 500Gb Serial ATA Raid, Apple 23 and 17 display. I thank you all in advance for your help.

    Cchanez replied 20 years, 4 months ago 2 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Chris Tompkins

    April 11, 2006 at 4:45 pm

    DV50 or 8bit uncompressed or 10 bit uncompressed – all will look great w/ your hirez photos.

  • Cchanez

    April 12, 2006 at 8:11 am

    Thank you very much for your input. So I am going to choose 10bit uncompressed, should I get a video card to help a bit on the rendering?

  • Chris Tompkins

    April 12, 2006 at 1:42 pm

    You need a card if u want to capture footage from a tape source.
    You can edit 10bit uncompressed w/o a card b/c u r using only stills and text.
    You can then compress the finished piece to DVD. If you want to output to tape – then u’ll need a card.

  • Cchanez

    April 12, 2006 at 2:13 pm

    All right thanks a lot for the info. Now coming back to the format issue, if I use a 10bit uncompressed setting, then my image size goes to 720×576 (I am in Switzerland and the format is PAL). My actual Hi Rez picture is at only approx 30 percent of its original size in order to fill the screen, that I understand. However if I choose a HD setting the image is at a higher percentage as far as size and also a much better quality, it is quite a lot crispier. What is this due to? My main concern is to make sure that when this will be projected onto a large screen approx 30 x 20 feet I will not have jagged edges everywhere, specially knowing that I started from hi rez images. Thank you.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy