Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy 4×3 to 16×9 transform to DigiBeta

  • 4×3 to 16×9 transform to DigiBeta

    Posted by David Roth weiss on December 7, 2005 at 8:13 pm

    A distributor will be marketing some of our documentaries to European TV, and they require a 16×9 Digibeta version in addition to the original 4×3 version.

    Am I correct in assuming that I should deliver in 16×9 anamorphic? Am I correct in assuming that it should behave similarly to an anamorphic 16×9 DVD, in that it will play 16×9 on 16×9 TVs and letterboxed on 4×3 TVs???

    Can anybody confirm that I’m thinking this through correctly???

    TIA,
    DRW

    David Roth weiss replied 20 years, 5 months ago 3 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Jimr

    December 7, 2005 at 9:40 pm

    Negative

    on Digibeta you would have to supply a 16.9 Anamorphic Version
    and a 4×3 Letterboxed Version.

    JimR

    Thanx,
    JimR

  • Nick Brenner

    December 8, 2005 at 2:40 am

    Yes you will have to supply 2 seperate tapes.
    If the program was made entirely in 4×3 domain then spit this out to digibeta. No letterbox, plain 4×3 as that was how it was shot. Easy.
    The 16×9 version is more difficult.
    With the 16×9 version you need more info from the distributor. Do they want the program to fill the 16×9 frame thus you blow up (arc) the 4×3 program and lose top and bottom of picture and quality (about 30% blow up). Maybe they only require it 14×9 safe thus the program is 16×9 but the picture does not go all the way to the edge of screen.
    The final way is not blowing up the picture at all but sticking a 4×3 image into the 16×9 sequence and you’ll have black bars down the sides when watching on a 16×9 monitor.
    I’d get more clarification before going ahead.
    cheers Nick

  • David Roth weiss

    December 8, 2005 at 3:41 am

    Thanks Nick, you have indeed coverd all the bases. I suspect they want a 16.x9 anamorphic, but as you say, I’d better check beforehand.

    DRW

  • David Roth weiss

    December 8, 2005 at 3:42 am

    Thanks Jim, tats what I think too, but I’ll check just to be sure…

    DRW

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy