-
Dealing with AVCHD/h.264/.mts when editing in Premiere CS6/Workflow
Hello all,
I searched the forum and found some old topics on this from 2011 but thought
I’d ask for some updated opinions.I currently use a Panasonic AF-100 at work, which shoots AVCHD. From my understanding AVCHD is h.264 and this particular camera puts it in a .mts wrapper (not sure if that’s standard or not)? My final product/export goes on Youtube (h.264) and some broadcast for commercials, PSAs, etc (MPEG2). I do some minor color correction/grading but nothing on a cinematography-like level.
For about a year I’ve been drilling down into AVCHD’s good’ol filing structure and pulling out my .mts files, encoding them to MPEG2, batch renaming and organizing in Bridge and, finally, importing into Premiere CS6.
I haven’t had any problems with this workflow, but I’m always looking for ways to improve and, recently, I began to question why I encode to MPEG2 for editing in Premiere. I originally encoded to MPEG2 because I assumed it would be easier (processing wise) on my MacPro (stats below) but I wonder if I should just edit AVCHD files in Premiere?
Do any of you see a quality difference between AVCHD and MPEG2? Does MPEG2 become lossy if I’m encoding AVCHD/h.264 to it? I always assumed h.264 was more lossy than MPEG2 but maybe I’m wasting my time encoding to it if my camera shoots h.264 natively (aka, encoding to MPEG2 is essentially making a bigger bucket for the same amount of data?). I know ProRes is a favorite on Macs; I have FCP7 and you would think I’d have the ProRes codec option in Encoder but I can’t find it. My basic question is which format will give me the most data going into Premiere to edit on -AVCHD or encoding to MPEG2, or something else?
Current MacPro:
2×2.4Ghz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
12GB RAM
ATI Radeon HD 5870 1024MB
OSX 10.9.4Thanks in advance!