Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe Premiere Pro Best codecs

  • Best codecs

    Posted by Ahmed Syed on November 20, 2012 at 6:44 pm

    Hi,

    We are planning to prepare a digital video library for our studio both of our taped and now tapeless format.

    What CODECs can you suggest best suited both for archival purpose and editing….a codec that is the best replacement for Apple Pro Res HQ?

    Thanks

    Shane Ross replied 13 years, 9 months ago 5 Members · 6 Replies
  • 6 Replies
  • Walter Soyka

    November 20, 2012 at 7:13 pm

    I don’t think there is any one good answer to this question: there’s no single, common, open codec and container combination.

    PhotoJPEG (at ~99%) MOV may currently be the most universal compressed format.

    Other notable “open” options include PNG and JPEG2000.

    Proprietary possibilities include Avid’s DNxHD (which is a SMPTE standard) and Go Pro’s CineForm (which I like as an intermediate codec, but whose long-term longevity may be a question).

    Lagarith AVIs are a notable lossless possibility. The codec itself is open-sourced, but commercial support is rather limited.

    AVC-Intra 100 Op1 MXF shows some promise.

    Walter Soyka
    Principal & Designer at Keen Live
    Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
    RenderBreak Blog – What I’m thinking when my workstation’s thinking
    Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events

  • Ryan Holmes

    November 20, 2012 at 9:28 pm

    [Ahmed Syed] “a codec that is the best replacement for Apple Pro Res HQ”

    Why are your replacing ProRes?

    I would say Avid’s DNxHD is the closest counterpart to Apple’s ProRes. Otherwise, Walter’s run down of the options is excellent!

    Ryan Holmes
    http://www.ryanholmes.me
    vimeo.com/ryanholmes

  • Walter Soyka

    November 20, 2012 at 9:32 pm

    [Ryan Holmes] “Why are your replacing ProRes?”

    Key question, Ryan!

    Ahmed, please read my original reply in the context of your archival codec question. I didn’t really attempt to answer the editorial question. To answer the editing codec question, we should talk more about your workflow (including why you want to transcode for editorial to begin with).

    Walter Soyka
    Principal & Designer at Keen Live
    Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
    RenderBreak Blog – What I’m thinking when my workstation’s thinking
    Creative Cow Forum Host: Live & Stage Events

  • Tom Daigon

    November 21, 2012 at 12:00 am

    Ahmed, the only reason I switched from Prores to DNxHD is I switched from the Mac platform to a PC where its not possible to export to export Prores, only read it. Otherwise I most likely would have stuck with Prores.

    Tom Daigon
    PrP / After Effects Editor
    http://www.hdshotsandcuts.com
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxPrG3WUyz8
    (Best viewed at 1080P and full screen)
    HP Z820 Dual 2687
    64GB ram
    Dulce DQg2 16TB raid

  • Ahmed Syed

    November 21, 2012 at 5:52 am

    Since we will be going for Adobe Premier Pro system shortly and switching away from apple FCP, we have apprehensions of Apple Pro Res as a codec to be used in the future.

    Thanks, all your suggestions and reply are highly appreciated.

  • Shane Ross

    November 21, 2012 at 8:32 pm

    Apple ProRes is still in use, and still in development. It is still used in FCX, their latest editing software…so it isn’t going anywhere at this time. Many deliverables still require it.

    Shane
    Little Frog Post
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy