Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro New version of Coremelt’s lock & load

  • New version of Coremelt’s lock & load

    Posted by Georg P. mueller on January 27, 2015 at 11:04 am

    I had some shaky footage and was looking for a better stabilizer than the one built into FCPX. Saw the great demo reel at coremelt and bought the latest version of Lock & Load (v.1.2.1).

    I found that Lock & Load was consistently worse than the built-in stabilization and resulted are sudden jerks and pumps, even with relatively stable shots (handheld interviews). It does not seem to work at all.

    Does anybody else have issues with lock & load?

    Georg

    Georg P. mueller replied 11 years, 3 months ago 3 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Gregor Queck

    January 27, 2015 at 5:46 pm

    I tested Coremelt’s plug, the integrated and
    Prodad Mercalli:
    https://www.prodad.com/home/products/video_optimization/300391667,l-us.html

    This is at the time only working in 7 and Motion, but I found it on most footage far superior to both… it’s worth a try, I think.

    Cheers, greg

  • John Rofrano

    January 27, 2015 at 9:48 pm

    [Georg P. Mueller] “Does anybody else have issues with lock & load?”

    No issues here at all. I’ve found Lock & Load to be better and much faster than the built-in stabilizer. It’s also important to note that stabilization is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Some stabilizers work better on certain footage than others. I used Lock & Load on a stage performance that I had to shoot hand-held and at one point I jerked the camera slightly when my hand cramped and Lock & Load smoothed it out perfectly. The build-in stabilizer still had quite a bit of shake left in the shot so I used the Lock & Load version in my final edit and no one picked up on it.

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

  • Georg P. mueller

    January 28, 2015 at 4:52 am

    I tried it with different cameras, different resolutions (1280, 1920 and 4K), on different computers. I tried tracking areas, all different modes and experimented with the strength sliders. In every single instance the built-in stabilization gave superior results right out of the box. Ah well, moving on and sticking with what I got.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy