-
FCPX editing hdv optimizing material
Hi everybody,
I’ve just got a job from a client asking to edit some clips shot with an HDV camera and he needs to deliver it all in 1920 x 1080 in (Photo Jpeg) .MOV .
I know that HDV material, sometimes, creates artifacts in images and some blurring on fast camera movings.
Wouldn’t be worst if I upsize the material from 1440 to 1920 ? I meant, if I make the original bigger I will also make the artifacts bigger.
Should it be better to downsize it to 1280 x 720 to minimize the “defects” ?
thanks.iMac 2.7 GHz Intel 4 Core i5
16 GB memoryMacBook Pro 17″
2.5 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
6GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAMOWC RAID 5 with 3TB
(2) External HD LaCieMac (400/800 FW and USB)with 500GB -(2) USB External HD Western Digital (in cases) with 750GB
OS X 10.6.5
Final Cut Studio “3” -
4 Replies
-
Stay native in size until the very end. Resizing twice just doesn’t sound like a good idea at all. Do the damage only once.
Jerry
Apple Certified Trainer, Producer, Writer, Director Editor, Gun for Hire and other things. I ski. My Blog: https://blogs.creativecow.net/Jerry-Hofmann
Current DVD:
https://store.creativecow.net/p/81/jerry_hofmanns_final_cut_system_setup8-Core 3.0 Intel Mac Pro, Dual 2 gig G5, AJA Kona SD, AJA Kona 2, Huge Systems Array UL3D, AJA Io HD, 17″ MBP, Matrox MXO2 with MAX – Cinema Displays I have a 22″ that I paid 4k for still working. G4 with Kona SD card, and SCSI card.
-
thanks for your answer.
I did as you said before I’ve received your answer.
I ingested or imported, I don’t know anymore the nomenclature …lol, I did the editings, color correction, “shared” exporting movie (prores .mov) and then sent to Compressor to get the Motion Jpeg codec (as asked by the client) but I had to use the Compressor 3.5 because Compressor 4 does not have that codec. There I changed the size to 1920×1080, progressive (the original material was 60i) and also tweaked a little with Frame Controls pushing the Anti-Alias to 35.
The result was not fantastic as it could be if the clips were shot in native HD but they look ok.iMac 2.7 GHz Intel 4 Core i5
16 GB memoryMacBook Pro 17″
2.5 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
6GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAMOWC RAID 5 with 3TB
(2) External HD LaCieMac (400/800 FW and USB)with 500GB -(2) USB External HD Western Digital (in cases) with 750GB
OS X 10.6.5
Final Cut Studio “3” -
There might be a couple problems with your workflow.
You might find it helps to deinterlace your 60i footage before sending it through compressor if you’re getting interlacing artifacts such as combing.
As for the resolution, HDV 1080i is actually the same as 1920×1080, but because of the aspect ratio of the pixels it comes in as 1440. Changing the pixel aspect ratio to square should result in a 1920×1080 file, if FCPX doesn’t do it automatically.
I haven’t run any HDV 60i footage yet, but if you need more help I’d be happy to try to recreate your workflow and see if we can’t clean it up any more.
-
Dear fellow,
Thanks for your interest in helping me.
Looking carefully on the Inspector window and selecting 1 clip on timeline, it shows 1440×1080 29,97 fps — 1080i HD — codec HDV 1080i60 (25 mb/s) Linear PCM. I’m trying to post a pic here ….
You said: “but because of the aspect ratio of the pixels it comes in as 1440. Changing the pixel aspect ratio to square should result in a 1920×1080 file, if FCPX doesn’t do it automatically. “
I guess FCPX, by Inspector, did not change automatically … If it is so, I will have to change the pixel aspect ratio and I could do it in Compressor, right ?Thanks again ….
iMac 2.7 GHz Intel 4 Core i5
16 GB memoryMacBook Pro 17″
2.5 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
6GB 667 MHz DDR2 SDRAMOWC RAID 5 with 3TB
(2) External HD LaCieMac (400/800 FW and USB)with 500GB -(2) USB External HD Western Digital (in cases) with 750GB
OS X 10.6.5
Final Cut Studio “3”
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up