Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Which RAID for FCPX?

  • Which RAID for FCPX?

    Posted by Jason Jenkins on October 16, 2011 at 5:02 am

    I’m looking at getting a Thunderbolt RAID. For $1,500 I can get either the Promise 6TB Pegasus R6 RAID, or the 8TB Pegasus R4 RAID. The R6 has 6 drives, so will be faster (800MB/s). The R4 has more space but slower speed (500MB/s). Will the extra speed even make a difference editing 1080p AVCHD on my Macbook Pro in FCPX? Even in RAID 5, will the R6 be less reliable because it has 6 drives that could fail versus 4 drives? Pertinent thoughts appreciated.

    Jason Jenkins
    Flowmotion Media
    Video production… with style!

    Cy Starkman replied 14 years, 5 months ago 5 Members · 13 Replies
  • 13 Replies
  • Jeremy Garchow

    October 16, 2011 at 6:26 am

    Both speeds will be fine with either ProRes, h264, or even uncompressed HD.

    I’d go for capacity.

  • John Flores

    October 17, 2011 at 7:04 pm

    The R4 with 4x 2TB drives is working fine for me, even the 5400RPM WD Green drives I’m using. I’m also editing 1080p AVCHD on a MBP (2011 2.2 quad core i7). Speed is fine except for rendering. I’m maxed out on RAM (8Mb) so my only option may be to create a rendering farm…

    johnmflores.com
    whatblogisthis.blogspot.com/

  • Jason Jenkins

    October 17, 2011 at 7:24 pm

    [john flores] “The R4 with 4x 2TB drives is working fine for me, even the 5400RPM WD Green drives I’m using. I’m also editing 1080p AVCHD on a MBP (2011 2.2 quad core i7). Speed is fine except for rendering. I’m maxed out on RAM (8Mb) so my only option may be to create a rendering farm…”

    Did the R4 increase your render speed at all? I’m using a single external SATA drive now and I’m wondering if I’ll see a boost in render speed when moving to a faster RAID. FYI, Other World Computing has a 16GB RAM upgrade for the Macbook Pro.

    Jason Jenkins
    Flowmotion Media
    Video production… with style!

  • Jason Jenkins

    October 17, 2011 at 7:25 pm

    [Jeremy Garchow] “Both speeds will be fine with either ProRes, h264, or even uncompressed HD.

    I’d go for capacity.”

    Thanks for chiming in, Jeremy. Will a high speed RAID decrease render time at all?

    Jason Jenkins
    Flowmotion Media
    Video production… with style!

  • Jeremy Garchow

    October 17, 2011 at 7:45 pm

    [Jason Jenkins] “Thanks for chiming in, Jeremy. Will a high speed RAID decrease render time at all?”

    Not of any significance, especially with the speeds you would be getting from either of those raids. I would love it if an NLE could render @ 4-500 MB/sec! 🙂 Unfortunately, it just don’t work that way.

    Faster/more/better processors are the biggest factor in render performance.

    Jeremy

  • Jason Jenkins

    October 17, 2011 at 7:51 pm

    [Jeremy Garchow]
    Not of any significance, especially with the speeds you would be getting from either of those raids. I would love it if an NLE could render @ 4-500 MB/sec! 🙂 Unfortunately, it just don’t work that way.

    Faster/more/better processors are the biggest factor in render performance.”

    Will a faster RAID increase realtime performance? In other words, will it decrease the need to render?

    Jason Jenkins
    Flowmotion Media
    Video production… with style!

  • Jeremy Garchow

    October 17, 2011 at 7:55 pm

    [Jason Jenkins] “Will a faster RAID increase realtime performance? In other words, will it decrease the need to render?”

    Yes, but at those speeds, you won’t notice a difference there either. 400 or 500 MB/sec is great speed, and with FCPX’s much improved real time engine, I would go for capacity as there’s never enough space.

    Jeremy

  • Jason Jenkins

    October 17, 2011 at 8:05 pm

    [Jeremy Garchow] “[Jason Jenkins] “Will a faster RAID increase realtime performance? In other words, will it decrease the need to render?”

    Yes, but at those speeds, you won’t notice a difference there either. 400 or 500 MB/sec is great speed, and with FCPX’s much improved real time engine, I would go for capacity as there’s never enough space.”

    Actually, I was thinking of performance in terms of my single ESATA drive (110MB/s) versus the RAID (500MB/s). Will I see a difference in realtime performance there? I’m just trying to get a feel for what I’m getting for my money. If I’m only getting data security, then a much less expensive mirrored setup will work just as well.

    Jason Jenkins
    Flowmotion Media
    Video production… with style!

  • Jeremy Garchow

    October 17, 2011 at 8:13 pm

    [Jason Jenkins] “Actually, I was thinking of performance in terms of my single ESATA drive (110MB/s) versus the RAID (500MB/s). Will I see a difference in realtime performance there? I’m just trying to get a feel for what I’m getting for my money. If I’m only getting data security, then a much less expensive mirrored setup will work just as well.”

    Got ya. Sorry, I thought you were comparing the two. Yes, you should see more playback performance vs the single drive but FCPX is a totally different beast when it comes to this. The playback engine is much improved.

  • Jason Jenkins

    October 17, 2011 at 8:29 pm

    [Jeremy Garchow] “Yes, you should see more playback performance vs the single drive but FCPX is a totally different beast when it comes to this. The playback engine is much improved.”

    Ha! I was hoping for something more definitive, but FCPX is still too new. I am amazed at what it will do on my 2011 Macbook Pro!

    Jason Jenkins
    Flowmotion Media
    Video production… with style!

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy