-
Apple should’ve watched this video before developing FCPX
This transition was handled beautifully. Hard to believe FCPX came from the same company…
Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
-
2 Replies
-
Hi
So what’s happened since then?
Steve’s health problems are what’s happened. 🙁So now he’s delegating.
At the moment his focus is directed, like the Eye of Mordor, on the Cloud and his new mothership headquarters building….
The orc-masters are handling this sort of routine roll-out* 🙁An example (possibly):
When Steve was away awaiting his liver transplant in early 2009 Apple rolled out the Nehalem Mac Pro line.
The 2008 Mac Pros were excellent value for money – competetive with any Windows PC manufacturer’s product.
The 2009 Nehalem quad (and the 2010) carried an ‘Apple Tax’ of about $1000 compared to other similar computers.
Now obviously Steve wasn’t going to interfere in such a lucrative pricing strategy.
But I think it shows that the new managers ‘think different’ in many ways from the Jobs-centric Apple of old 🙁* The FCP X roll-out: as David Pogue writes, “Apple blew it”. 🙁
-
this so called “roll out” is a debacle of epic proportions. whats saving apples stock right now is that its not a widely used app or piece of hardware.
Should it have been a new “screwed up” ipod, the investment community/wall street would have trashed the company because they would calmly say , Steve is not around because of illness so there is no one to lead, and there fore what is apples future with such bad management decisions…..RED,DSLR, FCS and more,
High End, Production & Post Production
in the Caribbean
http://www.bistt.com
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up