-
New Interface, New Everything, but Time to learn it all over again?
I’ve been reading several on-line articles and forums about the new FCP X, and the only thing that I’m concerned about (and maybe this is where people post and reassure me) is its quick adaptability, integration, and learning that will have to take place within thousands of production houses. I’m seeing myself editing for a client, and all of the sudden, I’m trying to navigate through learning a whole new interface. I know that several people have used the word “democratization” in their explanations, and I understand that all things will change and evolve. But with cameras for example, the process of DP work is still very much a few days learning the new camera or camera format, but all the other elements are the same, lighting, framing, color balance, filters, depth of field, etc. Going from VHS to DV to tapeless HD, it gets better and better and somewhat easier and easier, but post is a completely different story. I know several people going back to Windows XP a few days after trying to figure out Vista, some love Vista, I do, and that is great. But my concerns are only because of the situations where clients are not all going to want to wait around for editors to navigate a whole new interface, and so that learning must be done during “off” time, at home, or at a library, so. But when do media professionals have off-time? It’s going to have to be a dedication and yes, more needed learning. But I know there are a lot of features that are designed to make life better, but is that what a lot of editors are needing, is a whole new software build? Tapeless workflow made sense and for DPs and camera guys, yes it can make life better, and save time and money. But it saving money a bonus here when everyone can buy it for $299? It makes perfect business sense, but what about the last 10 years of FCP evolution, to scrap and build a new one, it’s exciting but scary. In the end, this seems to be part of the gone with the old, but those who are dictating what is old and what is new, in terms of post production, seems to raise lots of questions. And I hope that in the end, it’s great and does all what people are saying it does, but this means everyone is going to have to re-learn the tool. Some may think why re-invent the wheel that’s been turning for years. Processes vs editing philosophy is not what I’m referring to, I’m looking at this in terms on making the educational investment to use the tools, is that time going to exist for me to have time to learn this all, not only all the new tools, but the new interface in general? I’m excited, but also nervous, anyone else share the same sentiment? I look forward to hearing more about FCPX, and trying it, and hope the learning curve is not too cumbersome.
Love to hear your thoughts,
Tom Laughlin
Producer/Editor
Salt Lake City, UT
FCP7/Sony EX-3/Mac Quad-Core Intel