Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DaVinci Resolve Resolve 11 odd LUM qualifier behavior

  • Resolve 11 odd LUM qualifier behavior

    Posted by Michael Wolf on August 22, 2014 at 1:57 am

    Was trying to qualify just the keyboard in this shot…

    Tried just manually adjusting the LUM only qualifier to include the bottom 10% of luminance, but I found I had to crank ‘Low’ all the way up to 50% to begin to get a matte…

    Then, curious, I tried to qualify the brights and found I have to crank ‘High’ down to 75% to start to get a matte…

    So now, to put a little science on it, I loaded up a RAMP. Sure enough, the darks don’t start to be included in the matte until ‘Low’ get above 50%, and the brights don’t start to be included in the matte until ‘High’ gets below 75%…

    Anyone have any explanation of this behavior?

    Michael Wolf
    http://www.mikewolfpost.com

    Michael Wolf replied 11 years, 8 months ago 4 Members · 5 Replies
  • 5 Replies
  • Toby Tomkins

    August 22, 2014 at 7:12 am

    This is indeed terrible. The saturation scale isn’t great either.

    It would also be nice to be able to set ranges or have a log preset for these ranges.

  • Juan Salvo

    August 22, 2014 at 11:25 pm

    Resolve operates in 32bit float. That means you can have data below black and above white. This is handy for say recovering information lost in highlights or shadows, the qualifiers respond in correspondence with the data resolve is able to differentiate.

    https://JuanSalvo.com
    https://theColourSpace.com

  • Michael Wolf

    August 22, 2014 at 11:35 pm

    Got it. Would be nice to have an option to have the levels in the qualifiers track more closely with the levels in the actual picture.

    Michael Wolf
    http://www.mikewolfpost.com

  • Sascha Haber

    August 25, 2014 at 9:40 pm

    I totally agree

    A slice of color…

    Resolve 10.1.4 – Smoke 2015
    Colorist / VFX / Aerial footage nerd
    https://vimeo.com/saschahaber

  • Michael Wolf

    August 26, 2014 at 7:10 am

    It does, however, say ‘0’ at the bottom and ‘100’ at the top, so I expected that to translate to 0% and 100% level as seen on a scope.

    Michael Wolf
    http://www.mikewolfpost.com

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy