Activity › Forums › DaVinci Resolve › Keying out sky and replacing with timelapse
-
Keying out sky and replacing with timelapse
Posted by Josh Phoenix on June 16, 2012 at 8:34 pmI have not used Davinci resolve for layered tracks much. This is a pretty simple task in Premiere but I believe the keying in resolve is much better. Is there a straight forward way of letting your bottom layer come through to where you key your image?
Sascha Haber replied 13 years, 10 months ago 6 Members · 13 Replies -
13 Replies
-
Bristol Cruz
June 16, 2012 at 8:51 pmHi,
Resolve is not a compositing tool, so you will achieve much better results by using an another software. Smoke, AE etc.
-
Juan Salvo
June 17, 2012 at 4:27 amActually you can stack the layers… use a qualifier to create a key and then feed that key into an Alpha Out on a clip. There by revealing what’s underneath. But you are still probably better off on a true compositing app. Though this is a good way of creating a rough composite in order to better balance the colors.
Online Editor | Colorist | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
Sascha Haber
June 17, 2012 at 9:07 amIf there would only be a plugin path….OFX has some niiice keyers.
A slice of color…
DaVinci 8.2.1 OSX 10.7.2
MacPro 5.1 2×2,4 24GB
RAID0 8TB
GTX 470 / Quadro 4000
Extreme 3D+ICA Instructor
https://www.icolorist.com/Sascha.html -
Juan Salvo
June 17, 2012 at 7:16 pmNo kidding. Not to mention being able to use the plugin in a node and generate some mattes… So use a great keyer as a compliment to the qualifier. Hopefully in the future, they have listened to many of our requests in the past.
Online Editor | Colorist | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
Sascha Haber
June 18, 2012 at 6:59 amI totally agree on that one…
I think the biggest benefit for most of the people joining the game these days would be to finish the piece IN Resolve and not having to go back to their Premiere or AVID or FCP.
Personally I dont see much use in going back, but thats because I am either getting 15 shot commercials with tons of effects or full movies on the table, and both with end in the grading app, at least the non-logo part.A slice of color…
DaVinci 8.2.1 OSX 10.7.2
MacPro 5.1 2×2,4 24GB
RAID0 8TB
GTX 470 / Quadro 4000
Extreme 3D+ICA Instructor
https://www.icolorist.com/Sascha.html -
Margus Voll
June 18, 2012 at 7:54 amPlug-ins would be nice but we would loose realtime and more complains will go to config forum i bet
like “i try to run on my iPhone and nothing works” style.—
Margus
DaVinci 8.2.1 OSX 10.7.3
MacPro 5.1 2×2,93 24GB
GTX 470 / Quadro 4000
Multibridge 2 Pro -
Robert Houllahan
June 18, 2012 at 4:17 pmI think the loss of realtime for some OFX plugins would be offset by the added functionality offered. And I think that some of the costs associated with top OFX plugins would keep the config questions to a minimum.
-Rob-
Robert Houllahan
Director / Colorist
Cinelab Inc.
http://www.cinelab.comMAHC-PRO 6-Core 3X GTX285 20Tb SAS Wave Panel Panny 11UK SDI Plasma. Light-Space CMS + Hubble
-
Sascha Haber
June 18, 2012 at 4:46 pmi heard that before….so does Noise reduction on level 1.
i am losing more time exporting to AE to do the thing and bring it back.
Also it could spawn the idea of an render node that does the heavy lifting and writes back images to the cache which the main app is then displaying.A slice of color…
DaVinci 8.2.1 OSX 10.7.2
MacPro 5.1 2×2,4 24GB
RAID0 8TB
GTX 470 / Quadro 4000
Extreme 3D+ICA Instructor
https://www.icolorist.com/Sascha.html -
Juan Salvo
June 18, 2012 at 4:55 pmSpeaking or nr… Neat video has an OFX edition. 😉
Online Editor | Colorist | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up