Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe Photoshop 72 pixels to 300 pixels with a twist

  • 72 pixels to 300 pixels with a twist

    Posted by Rufus Napkin on September 17, 2005 at 2:47 am

    I have a 78 by 56 inch project at 72 pixels (several layers). Before taking it to the printers I need to make one 5X7 jpg, and one 24X36 jpg, both out of this original. Both need to be 300 pixels.

    How do I do this WITHOUT compromising the visual quality of the original?

    Thanks!

    Richard Harrington replied 20 years, 7 months ago 2 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Richard Harrington

    September 17, 2005 at 3:36 am

    78 inch X 72 ppi = 5616 total pixels
    56 inch X 72 ppi = 4032 total pixels

    Just use Image Size Comman

    The first

    5 X 7 at 300 dpi means 1500 X 2100 total pixels

    Not a problem

    the second size

    24 X 36 at 300 ppi = 7200 X 10800

    Which means: “WITHOUT compromising the visual quality of the original?”

    You’re screwed.. you can’t up res without losing something…

    Also

    The Aspect ratio of your original (width divided by height) is approximately 1.4

    What you are aasking for is .72 and .66 respectively

    Also.. can’t see why your printer would ask for a JPEG… not a professional output format for that sort of thing…

    The short answer you have a lack of resolution compounded by a mismatch of ratios, file formats, and a few other things.

    Richard M. Harrington, PMP

    Author: Photoshop CS for Nonlinear Editors
    Co-Author Final Cut Pro on the Spot, After Effects on the Spot, Broadcast Graphics on the Spot, and After Effects @ Work
    Check out the new DVD: Photoshop CS: Essentials for Digital Video from http://www.photoshopforvideo.com

    edit – produce – direct –

  • Rufus Napkin

    September 20, 2005 at 4:52 am

    Richard,

    Thank you for taking the time to explain all this. You are the best. The original’s composite was scanned at 72 – ergo the end result. Based on your conclusion with the bigger print I will try using Genuine Fractals to enlarge (probably X 2), see how it looks.

    Thanks again.

    R

  • Richard Harrington

    September 30, 2005 at 6:22 pm

    Good luck… thanks for closing loop

    Richard M. Harrington, PMP

    Author: Photoshop CS for Nonlinear Editors
    Co-Author Final Cut Pro on the Spot, After Effects on the Spot, Broadcast Graphics on the Spot, and After Effects @ Work
    Check out the new DVD: Photoshop CS: Essentials for Digital Video from http://www.photoshopforvideo.com

    edit – produce – direct –

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy