Hi Aaron,
I have a similar Canon VIXIA (HF100 I think – about 3yrs old).
When I first got it the MTS files were a HUGE pain & I could only play them in VLC or the bundled software (which I stupidly threw away).
After upgrading from Vista to Windows 7 (still 32-bit for now), MTS clips automatically play very well using the latest Windows Media Player, even directly off my SD card (which I don’t really recommend). My older XP desktop benefited somewhat from a new video card, but raw MTS playback still kinda sucks. Hardware limitation since it’s really the processors that have to de-compress the files.
For playback on a Mac, VLC works ok but insists on opening each new video at full HUGE 1080p, which has to be manually resized. You can allegedly convert to QuickTime format using iMovie, but the resulting files are massive & I haven’t tried.
After Effects & Premiere only supported MTS and MP4 files well from CS4 on – if you have CS3 you’d want to upgrade. CS5 (64-bit OS only!) handles MTS files very well & was designed for HD playback/editing. Haven’t crashed it yet, which I couldn’t say for CS4 (got in the habit of saving after EVERY change).
Your question actually got me to look into the 24P/60i pulldown issue, which I never really clearly understood or bothered with … There are “remove pulldown” or “Guess Pulldown” check boxes in both Premiere and After Effects when you import/interpret footage (AE allegedly works better). As I understand it, they will attempt to identify & remove the duplicate frames to properly de-interlace your 60i footage & turn it into “real” 24p.
I need to go home & try this myself, because I had a horrible time trying to convert my 1920×1080 “24P Mode” MTS files to a more workable alternative. After lots of experimentation w/Media Encoder, it seemed 720p MP4s @ 29.97 were the only thing that worked w/o stuttering – probably because I didn’t properly remove the pulldown! That little check box probably would’ve made all the difference…
YouTube converts all uploaded videos to 30FPS FLVs & MP4s anyway, so you don’t really need to worry about that. You’d just be re-compressing a compressed file for further loss of quality. I think the only necessary change is to ensure your renders/projects use “progressive (no fields)” frame settings, since they’ll be for computers & not broadcast.
Haven’t done 3D tracking, but knowing a bit of the concept I imagine it’d be easier to track a progressive shot than an interlaced one, and would suggest removing the pulldown first & using “progressive” settings in your project. Otherwise your tracking points would constantly jitter between interlaced fields or just disappear completely between frames, wouldn’t they?
Found this article w/a link to a Script for AE that might be useful:
https://www.coertvonk.com/technology/videoediting/24p-avchd-with-pp-cs5-2697
Going to try it out myself later on. Might have to revisit all the old files I converted! 🙂 Anyway, I hope that helps & isn’t just a bunch of rambling nonsense…
Good luck & thanks for inspiring me to investigate!
~ Mike