-
Need some good arguments regarding archival quality media
I need some expert advice and support for an argument at the office.
We’ve been bumping old tape formats in our library to DVD-R and then recycling the tapes. That was step 1. Just getting everything off obsolete formats before the taspes rot or the decks die. And we’ve done that.
I am getting push-back on going on to step 2, which would be making backup dubs of the DVD’s to archival-quality media, and storing those securely off-site. The guys here think it is “good enough” to just burn a second copy using the same 15 bucks per spindle generic brand disks, and the Taio’s I want are more like $35 per 50-unit spindle. So there IS a strong financial component to the argument that is holding the most sway right now.
My counter-argument is that the cheap DVD’s may be good for a year, maybe five, but they might stop working as soon as next month, becasue you don’t know what kind of longevity you get with an off-brand commodity-based product. And then all the time and effort that went into making the dubs is wasted, and the footage is lost forever.
Before anyone suggests it, there is no money for the size of hard drive array our library would take up. We have to do something based on DVD-R technology on shelves. Though I think BluRay would be better, I get even moer resistance to that idea than the gold-backed archival quality DVD media.
Any thoughts? Specific recommendations as to brands? Are we even in agreement with my overall premise?