-
Mole-Richardson LED Fresnels
Has anyone had any hands-on field experience with any of the Mole LED Fresnel line of lights?
On-paper tech specs look pretty great. Especially compared to other LED options, given the price. If I’m reading this right (see links) footcandle output on the 150w LED on up to the larger units exceeds that of the Cineo TruColor HS and the Litepanel Hilio when looking at equal beam angles, i.e. degree spread in the panels vs. the equivalent degree in spot/flood.
Mole 150w – https://mole.com/lighting/led/baby/pdf/baby_pd.pdf
Cineo HS – https://www.cineolighting.com/index.php/pages/product_hs/106
Hilio – https://www.litepanels.com/hilio.php
Now I know full well they’re a different type of light than my other examples, being a fresnel as opposed to a panel of soft wash, although the Hilio is quite spotty at 15 degrees. But I’d rather put on a piece of 250 or 216 on the 150w Mole and still probably have a similar output level than pay an additional 2K+ for the wider spread of the HS. The CRI of the Moles are somewhat lower at 90 and they are bigger (but not prohibitively so), but as far as output performance to price, it looks like a much better deal. I’m a big fan of Mole’s tungsten units and I’ve been frustrated at the degree of difficulty to control the light output of LEDs, like cutting or flagging them. To me, they’re basically good as key lights for talent and just general wash, so the idea of being able to have the same or better output with familiar fresnel performance at a much cheaper price sounds very enticing.
Just to be clear, I’m not bashing the Cineo lights, I have used them and like them a great deal!
Am I missing something? Anyone field-test these guys?

