-
After testing SVP12 on different computer equipped with Quadro K5000, have interesting info and a question
Today I had access to a fairly fast machine ( 6-core Xeon, Sandy Bridge) equipped with an Nvidia Quadro K5000. I installed the SVP12.770 trial and ran through the “red car” benchmark.
Something interesting. Using the Main Concept AVC encoder in either CUDA, OpenCL or CPU only mode, the render time was about 3:26. Not much different with any option. (and just in case anyone asks, yes Vegas was properly detecting the Kepler card, and for video preview, the playback was very, very nice even at Good or Best).
Then I tried the Sony AVC encoder and was surprised! using “render using GPU” the GPU utilization went to about 60%, CPU dropped to less than 40%, and it completed the render in 2:04 .
So, clearly the Sony AVC encoder can use Kepler.
That got me thinking about my home system, my old slow T7500 with Quadro 2000. On it, I can get about the same render time in Main Concept using CUDA as I was getting on the 6-core Xeon ( ~ 3:26) . But my Sony AVC renders are about 3:37 and the preview playback is laggy.
I might be willing to pick up a K5000, hoping that someday MainConcept will fix their encoder, and in the meantime enjoy the better preview and better Sony AVC encoder performance. But I would hate to loose out on the decent MainConcept acceleration I get with my Fermi Quadro 2000.
Could I install both cards? Use the K5000 for my displays and have the Quadro in there just for Fermi support? Would Vegas see both of them and let me choose the Quadro 2000 when I want to render with MainConcept, but otherwise use the K5000 for better preview and Sony AVC renders?
Confused,
Steve
Win7 Pro X64 on Dell T7500, MultiTB SATA, 12GB RAM, nVidia Quadro 2000, Vegas 12, 11, 10, 9 DVDA 6.0 & 5.2(build 135) Sony HDR-CX550V, Panasonic GH3 with LUMIX G X VARIO 12-35mm / F2.8 ASPH, LUMIX G X VARIO 35-100mm / F2.8