<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Creative COW | Tyler McNeill | Activity</title>
	<link>https://creativecow.net/members/tylermcneill/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://creativecow.net/members/tylermcneill/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Tyler McNeill.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 18:17:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.5.10</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bf55a69bf724ea0d4af208236a4047f9</guid>
				<title>Tyler Mcneill replied to the discussion Tool for extracting only moving pixels? in the forum Adobe After Effects</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/tool-for-extracting-only-moving-pixels/#post-2459467</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 05:37:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/tool-for-extracting-only-moving-pixels/#post-2459467"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Tool for extracting only moving pixels?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hi Gregory, </p>
<p>Yes that was my solution to the problem too. But alas it is a complex scene with lots of moving parts and people. Rotobrush is doing a much better job than a few years before but it&#8217;s still very time consuming. But still thank you for your quick reply!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d92534c966e2e2ad5e3095a5b4409062</guid>
				<title>Tyler Mcneill replied to the discussion Tool for extracting only moving pixels? in the forum Adobe After Effects</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/tool-for-extracting-only-moving-pixels/#post-2459466</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 05:33:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/tool-for-extracting-only-moving-pixels/#post-2459466"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Tool for extracting only moving pixels?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hi Mads, I was thinking of difference keying first but alas there was no clean plate to work with. I thought mathematically it probably wouldn&#8217;t be a problem to determine the movement of a pixel and turn that into a matte and that there is probably already a tool out there. But thank you anyways!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">44d82878d3b009e9a2ed79808095b758</guid>
				<title>Tyler Mcneill started the discussion Tool for extracting only moving pixels? in the forum Adobe After Effects</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/tool-for-extracting-only-moving-pixels/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 09:37:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/tool-for-extracting-only-moving-pixels/">Tool for extracting only moving pixels?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hello there,</p>
<p></p>
<p>I have a pretty weird question but maybe there already is a solution out there.</p>
<p>I have a plate where I only want to keep the moving elements and key out the rest. Is there a tool out there (maybe not even only in AE) that can delete pixels that have no motion and just leaves the rest?</p>
<p></p>
<p>I hope I made it clear enough to get across what I&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-397549"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/tool-for-extracting-only-moving-pixels/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d0d4d7ca5fe14ccbf173a90a5158f5b9</guid>
				<title>Tyler Mcneill started the discussion Render in ProRes422 or 4444? in the forum Adobe After Effects</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/render-in-prores422-or-4444/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 09:34:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/render-in-prores422-or-4444/">Render in ProRes422 or 4444?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hello there,</p>
<p>sometimes we get ProRes422-footage to work on, sometimes 4444 for keying. </p>
<p>The usual way of handeling was to export the way we got it. Wouldn&#8217;t it be better to always export 4444, so colors are preserved better (even if the source was 422)?</p>
<p></p>
<p>Thanks very much in advance!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0d35db76beb16dea90ce5b557a9938e7</guid>
				<title>Tyler Mcneill started the discussion Weird Graph in editor in the forum Adobe After Effects</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/weird-graph-in-editor/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 13:05:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/weird-graph-in-editor/">Weird Graph in editor</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I am working in a project set up by a colleague and I find these weird graphs in his tracking data. They never look like that when I am tracking stuff in mocha AE. The motion is there but each frame seem to have 2 keyframes.</p>
<p>I bet it&#8217;s just some setting I don&#8217;t know about.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Thanks in advance!</p>
<p></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7d15c8c16d3eeb611d064a97ab795ff9</guid>
				<title>Tyler Mcneill started the discussion Image in AE viewport looks better than final rendering. in the forum Adobe After Effects</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/image-in-ae-viewport-looks-better-than-final-rendering/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 05:28:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/image-in-ae-viewport-looks-better-than-final-rendering/">Image in AE viewport looks better than final rendering.</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hello,</p>
<p>I have sort of an anti aliasing problem, I guess. I have inserted a graphic made by another artist into my UHD comp. It contains basically newspaper articles, lots of letters. The resolution of the graphic is ok, I would say. No jagged edges and it looks ok and smooth in AE comp view. But when I render a ProRes 422 hq file it looks all&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-334407"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/image-in-ae-viewport-looks-better-than-final-rendering/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		