<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Creative COW | Nathaniel Cooper | Activity</title>
	<link>https://creativecow.net/members/nathanielcooper/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://creativecow.net/members/nathanielcooper/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Nathaniel Cooper.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 06:52:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.5.10</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e0b685b4a6f2511ec584e22a1e58d50c</guid>
				<title>Nathaniel Cooper replied to the discussion Stupid question.... in the forum Storage &#38; Archiving</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/stupid-question-18/#post-2251008</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:40:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/stupid-question-18/#post-2251008"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Stupid question....</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Yes, having local access will give you more performance than remote.  If the IT team is setting up a VPN, I&#8217;d say let them go for it, there&#8217;s not a reason not to.   For opening and working on an AE project, it will depend on what is in the project/how big it is/connection speed at home &amp; the office.<br />
Smaller AE projects will buffer in RAM and could&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2658"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/stupid-question-18/#post-2251008" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">57fbe3ea00cb4b2587db9b58f3471e63</guid>
				<title>Nathaniel Cooper replied to the discussion 10 GBe config in the forum Storage &#38; Archiving</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/10-gbe-config-2/#post-2251002</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 20:50:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/10-gbe-config-2/#post-2251002"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> 10 GBe config</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>It&#8217;s far from conclusive, but the Aquantia NICs are what concern me.  We (ProMAX) have had a ton of trouble with those.  It&#8217;s the same hardware chip that Bob mentioned in the Sonnet Solo and not to expect beyond 400MB/s.  We have seen WILD swings in performance on the Aquantia NICs (like 500MB/s on NIC &#8220;A&#8221; and 150MB/s on NIC &#8220;B&#8221; with all other&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2641"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/10-gbe-config-2/#post-2251002" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		